When I saw James Corbett playing along with this stupid fucking IHR bullshit, it made me wonder about that whole CHD Universe.
Which was good.
He absolutely knows better.
When you see Meryl Nass and Abby Rockefeller together at Robert F. Kennedy, Jr's announcement and also Abby appearing on CHD touting Raw Milk, it's like they are daring you to point out the collusion with the richest assholes who run the world.
The whole purpose of this in my estimation and all that Malone 'INTERNATIONAL HEALTH CRISIS' SUMMIT crap is to make sure that people don't grok the US DOD was running the campaign and if history is any guide, probably in tandem with Israel.
Corbett used to go on CHD and participate in this WHO is the baddy bullshit and if ANYBODY knows how the world works top down, it is James Corbett.
This is the same fucking bullshit Operation that CIA Tucker Carlson and Sayanim Bret Weinstein tried to run with "Goliath" pushing poor widddle US around.
Let me know if you need a comp to read some of the links.
Roguski seems to have turned his attention to campaigning to repeal the PREP Act. Is he doing that because he knows it will never happen, given that they're almost certain to go for a 'bird flu' or resurrected-covid* plandemic at the end of this year?
*New variants bustin' out all over ATM, along with new vaxxes.
I'm not sure, but I expect he is doing it because he's looking for a crack in the insanity that would allow the public to prosecute the criminals in the pharmaceutical Cartel. That said, I don't think he has yet gone far enough down the rabbit hole to understand that our politicians and government agencies exist to protect the Cartel (the Medical Industrial Complex) and have never existed to protect the public. Hence, that fight will go absolutely nowhere.
I’ve been reading Substack articles for a little less than year now, and GreaterIsrahell is correct. I've noted the morass of detail in many, many substacks which overwhelms a reader resulting in zero meaningful input. No conclusions are drawn. The reader is left in a hazy picture steeped in overwhelming fright, fear, or stupefication.
It's well worth noting what the word "stupefy" means. "To dull the senses or capacity to think thereby reducing responsiveness; to stun." A subsidiary meaning is: "Strike dumb, stun with amazement...."
The latter is important because the reader is left in a state of suspended animation wherein they expect resolution from further reports or research but none comes. Conclusions are deliberately not drawn.
The mobile phone accomplishes the same result by the very nature of the instrument if used to understand the world as opposed to simply telephone talk. The individual is left believing that only further research, revelations, and so forth will provide conclusions with steady, unending news flashes on the hour.
The reader either emotes exposing feelings or continues, much as the Q readers did, waiting for answers...for more clarification.
Your article demonstrates that conclusions can be reached with current information available.
It’s taken me nearly a year to arrive at these conclusions, and I’ve participated in many of the psyops not knowing.
One of the best is "nanotech in the blood." While some nanotech may, indeed, be present, the presentation has nearly only included the author as an afflicted victim or a "scientist" with a microscope "reporting." The only net effect has been an overwhelming fear of possible disease arising from this nanotech and an **endless** search for remedies.
Only recently…just a few days ago…did I see a substack which showed our white blood cells encircling and eliminating the "nanotech."
Another tell is the "brittle author response." A criticism is offered not to demean the author but to reply in an unextraordinary fashion to their article. The author returns with a stream of powerful emotions uplifting himself and blasting "his opposition." A secure author never responds in this fashion.
The real, real, real trouble is that incorporated within these articles is some truth along with skewed perceptions. Most people can’t understand that "both/and" apply because everything must be "black/white." Their minds have been structured (current education system, cell phones, Hollywood, etc.) that everything is "all right or all wrong." So, the reader knows one or two points as truth—having seen proof offered elsewhere by someone, like you, who actually researched and brought the receipts. Thus, all the rest of the article must be "true."
Are all these contributors misleading deliberately? I think not. I think many, many people can’t realize the depth and length of misperception and, thus, how much their own thinking and structuring of reality is based upon misperception.
Thank you! And, I agree that there are many people who are trying to report on the truth as they understand it and simply do not yet understand how deep down the rabbit hole they need to go to get to the full truth. I don't for one moment believe I have reached the bottom and have the full truth on any topic. In fact, the more I learn and study, the more I am aware of how little I know. There are many on Substack and other media platforms however who are trying to deceive and whose role it is to confuse and misdirect the public. I will always call those people out when I see them, in hopes some of the people following their information will see more clearly that they can't be trusted. Thanks for your comment and again, thanks for reading my article!
Soviet defector and former KGB operative Yuri Bezmenov warned us about ideological subversion in 1983 when he said:
"What it basically means is, to change the perception of reality, of every American, to such an extent that despite an abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their family, their community and their country."
I think you're absolutely correct. The principle response, both on the Left and Right sides of the political spectrum, is a "deer-in-the-headlights" reaction. Like an old movie playing from film in a canister. The movie jerks to a stop and keeps repeating the same scene. People are largely immobilized. One of the most tragic scenes which has arisen in the last 10 years, more likely in Europe but also present in the U.S., is the the European native who welcomes and freely associates with illegal immigrants under the false notion that multiculturalism and inclusion should be the highest principles followed. These people are mainly women who find themselves beaten and raped...many times by gangs. I note, too, many people who interpret the Christian ideal of "doing unto your neighbor as you would do unto yourself" to mean allowing dangerous criminals near the families. I'm a "true crime" fan and countless stories exist of the woman who befriends someone in a store or bar and ends up murdered, or the family who welcomes a self-confessed criminal into their family by renting a room to them. The remaining family always...always...remarks that she/they "was the kindest person; she would give you the shirt off her back."
The whole thing about Meryl is really simple. If she really wanted to inform me about anything she would send me one e-mail per day, and give me time to digest its contents.
Two years ago when I subscribed to her for a breif period she bombarded me with e-mails about minutia details that are meaningless.
Much like what Glenn greenwald does...... He bombards his audience with details that are spot on, but in the larger picture they are meaningless.
Meryl Nass, Glenn Greenwald, Matt Taibbi and loads more are there for one reason. They are there to try to get your eye off the ball.
I recommend anyone in politics or aspiring, actually read Gaddafi's "Green"book. It's excellent and discusses the importance of a country and its people to be free to self determine. It shows his plan that managed to in very short time, turn Libya from poverty dependence, to wealth and independence. And that really angered the BIS, IMF and their profiteers.😉
Re the IHR and WHO. Clarification- because in this game, it's important to be precise, because words have power. The word changes the meaning...like "mandatory"- it doesn't mean what people think it means. It's a contract word. They "Inego Montoya'ed" the crap out of it in 2020.
The "Pandemic Treaty" is a dog and pony show, that was used to distract the masses from the "IHR Amendments", which went through, with barely a blip. Yes your correct in the IHR creation and it being in effect since 1969. But in 2020 they began a process of amendment, and these amendments were significantly different from previous attempts. James Roguski is the expert on these and people should go direct to him for any info, he's a one man army.😉
People need to keep their eyes on the ball- the virus/no virus is a freaking distraction- they don't need a freaking virus do mimic the effects from tech they have already inputted into the eco systems, including humanity. If you do not understand this, I respectfully suggest learning everything you can about the $$32Billion dollar nanotechnology industry, cross reference it with the telecommunications industry research and then factor in biosensors distributed over the last 70 yrs of geoengineering and weather modification programs. "Virus" "Terrain" are weaponised WORDs. And what have we learnt about the importance of words in this game?😉
Hi there. Thanks for reading my article and for your comment. I understand your perspective regarding the whole there are viruses - there aren't viruses debate. However, I disagree with the idea that it's unimportant. Considering that almost all vaccines are purported to prevent viral illness and considering that a supposed killer virus was the reason for the 2020 plandemic, I think it's important to dig deep amd work to understand what is true and what isn't. When I first heard people discussing the topic, my initial reaction was similar to yours. However, I think it's important to understand the truth behind such controversies, and after doing some deep investigations and listening to both sides of the argument from a variety of researchers, I've come to the conclusion that virology has zero evidence to support its hypotheses. I've been an RN for 17 years and began my awakening process in 2020. To date, everything I learned in my training and education has proven to be ass-backwards. I began studying holistic medicine in 2020 and reassessing absolutely everything because I went into nursing with a desire to help people to heal and recover their health and wellness. To me, being able to educate people on the fraud that is allopathic medicine is important. You are welcome to your opinion though and I'm grateful for your ability to provide criticism without being mean. ;)
Fair enough, oppinion is important but recognising that it comes from bias, and only makes it true from a certain point of view. I'm actually an alternative health practitioner as well as having personal experience with allopathic medicine and their schooling, and while i inderstand the tantalising "ah ha!" moment for those that come from conventional medical thinking, when they discover terrainism, or alternative medicines more holistic approach, but it doesn't make it anymore truer than germ theory, because neither theories account for the effects of light in ANY of their experiments, "proof", or protecols.🤨 Again, if the 100% critical importance of that statement, does not make sense WHY its so important, then it means that very respectfully, you have made an opinion, based on half information, and set about calling it fact to the masses. Just as "germ theory" advocates did the first time around in history, that we have done this same tired arguements. When you look at the history of both conventional AND alternative medicine, you'll see that this same arguements has occurred before 🤨
Cowan, Kaufmann, Lenka, Bailey, and even Yeadon, and many others in the "no virus" dog show, have conducted great experiments, great analysis of germ theory pony show, but made exactly the same mistakes as their opposition- NONE have accounted for light. Which is precisely why I call it for what it is, a distracting dog and pony show. 😉🤔 It's also why it hasnt really been censored. When something is not allowed to be discussed because it is truth, I promise you, it doesn't get discussed! People think they have been fighting censorship, they have been fighting an illusion of it. Real censorship hasn't even begun in ernest, people don't even know what they don't know.😐
I took the time to comment on your stack, because I think you have a clear eye, to be able to look past the show and noise, to deeper than your peers and help bring that information to the surface, while people are shaking off the pandemic spell.
In the MAHA shenanigans something Bob K Jr has been silent about and something he knows is Trump backing Monsanto//Bayer via a 2019 EO after Bob won a CA case against them. Bob is aware of the EO as he stated it in a podcast pre POTUS rum.
Odd for a product that is known to damage health is not a major MAHA issue. Maybe big corp lobbyist Susie Wiles has something to do with that.
“Trump has publicly aligned himself with pesticide-seed companies to promote the cultivation of GMO crops.”
13 Jun 2019
Center for Food Safety | Press Releases | | CFS Statement: Trump Signs Executive Order to Further Gut Federal GMO Oversight
It is so depressing the shenanigans going on yet we ought to know the best we can.
I reposted this on my page as I was midway through the first paragraph.
One little thing, in the first paragraph, maybe there is a typo using the word "sew" (like using thread and needle to make clothes) which you might really have meant to write to "sow" (like to sow seeds in the ground to grow) at "They s[o]w disorder"?
Great work as usual SH. May I recommend J J Couey, PhD as a stellar and bright truth teller and teacher:. You know he's the real deal since his sole support comes from only a hundred or so supporters. The Algos treat him like a lepper.: Gigaohmbiological.com
It's a 100 year plan: "The compensatory economy provides that when bankers and speculators clean out the people and bring them to their knees, government agencies shall step in and help them up so that they can be fleeced again. This is the function of such agencies as the Securities and Exchange Commission, Reconstruction Finance Corporation and dozens of others. The theory of the compensatory economy supplants all morality in public life, and is responsible for much corruption of the officials in Washington. Thus, also, the predeliction of the international bankers for putting ignorant provincials into key positions is not an idle fancy, and is perhaps reason for much incessant publicity for democracy. It suits the internationals that public officials be of the stupidest type, and the guise of democracy effectively controls them." Eustace Mullins The Federal Reserve Conspiracy, 1954
Amazing article. That is a feat taking this train wreck from its origin up to the present day. I'm saving this one. I find your analysis of this entire debacle to be accurate.
I learned about the DREADD a few years ago from watching Dr. Charles Morgan's video presentation at West Point. I didn't know it was associated with Ivermectin. What is the scoop on that?
I"m new to this site. I stumbled onto your site somehow. I've been waking up for about a decade. This is one of the best articles I've ever read. Many thanks.
Proverbs 29:2
"When the righteous are in authority the people flourish, but when the wicked rule the people mourn."
Excellent research, Sarah! Can't even come close describing the pure joy of relief reading your absolutely brilliant summary of the Communist-Zionist connection. I'd say this buried link constitutes one of the most tabooed historical facts stigmatized from serious discussion in light of age-old psyops on the "ultra-antisemitic" end too often hijacking any discussion of Bolshevism and Zionism's interconnect to ostensibly tar "a la association" anyone who mentions this as also instantly suspected of "antisemitism."
Your summary of Russia I agree with almost 100%. Just a side note caveat -- isn't "Europa" that antisemitic psyop film? When approaching the issue of Bolshevism through the lens of an organized outside conspiracy, bear in mind that the age-old Jewish scapegoat is the false diversionary narrative since the true conspirators needed a patsy to absorb the blame. MI6, Wall Street, and Germany facilitated the October Revolution to overthrow Kerensky, and those same entities then blamed "the Jews" for Communism to exonerate themselves. In fact, in Germany, the same Prussian-Freemasonic elites who propelled the Nazis to power in the name of "stamping out Judeo-Bolshevism" were themselves the same conservative reactionaries who in 1917 sent Lenin on the sealed train to destabilize Petrograd.
Agree with your analysis of China (am ethnically Chinese myself and am aware of CPC brainwash legacy in my parents' generation) and Libya; wasn't aware that Mao was actually Rothschild-funded and Zionist-trained. Definitely though I long suspected he was an NWO stooge considering his apparent kinship to Jesuit UN spiritual forefather Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, plus the fact the CPC like all(?) Comintern entities were Fascist collaborationists in the 1930s-40s. The "Communist vs. Nazi" tension is a facade used to cloak both organizational umbrellas' modus operandi as joint heads of a single British Freemasonic synarchist creature used to absorb populist spillover on both the "left" and "right" into controlled opposition sectors unconsciously serving the bidding of Zionist-Masonic Shinar's global Babylonian priesthood while believing they are heralding the onset of a New Age gnosticized utopia.
I have only seen the 1st 2 episodes of the Europa docuseries and it was a couple of years ago, so I may not have picked up on possible psyoppery in what I watched, but the bulk of those 2 episodes was pretty accurate regarding the dirty details of the Bolshevik Revolution. But, yes, I think you're right and the series as a whole appears to be created to stoke the anti-Jewish sentiment the globalists want based on the explanations of some of the other episodes I read when I went back to look at it and grab the link last night. I didn't remember there being 10+ episodes, so that's why I advised my readers that I'm not vouching for the accuracy of the entire series. As you know, you can glean significant truth sometimes from psyop sources. Fall of the Cabal, foe example, had a lot of truth, but was written to promote the Q-Anon
Definitely more than welcome; your highly detailed compilations -- I gather -- are worth the equally detailed attention because of the important in-between-the-lines substance and their derived logical conclusions you are evidently very bold at pointing out. (incredibly solid stuff!)
Here's the spoiler to Bolshevism: it's 100% true -- as you point out -- that its architects were from without Russia and the product of a conspiracy to destroy the Czarist-oriented Orthodox Church. Now, just be very incredibly careful about the large majority of sensationalistic Rumble/Bitchute-flooded controlled opposition narratives spinning that into "Jewish ethnicity of Bolshevik leaders" arguments, however, because that mixes fact and fiction into a cyclical dead end.
The true architects of Communism are: Venetian oligarchs, Jesuits, Scottish Rite Freemasonry, MI6, Wall Street, German Prussian aristocrats, Young Turks Zionists, and possibly also the Knights of Malta and Warburgs. Long story short, Trotsky -- funded by Anglo-American financial interests -- was ensured safe travels to Petrograd in 1917 as a result of MI6 securing his release from Halifax detention initially ordered by the MI5, while the Leninist nexus was sent to Petrograd as a result of Young Turks British intel vassal Alexander Parvus (yes, he was "ethnically Jewish," but that doesn't per se prove a "Jewish conspiracy" at some en masse level) coordinating with Jesuit-trained Vatican-German diplomat Diego von Bergen of Imperial Germany's Foreign Office to launch Socialist and Communist terror against Kerensky's Provisional Government and elevate a Bolshevik regime to knock Russia out of WWI (which Lenin did in the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk later in 1918 after by that point already having usurped Russia from the Kerenskyite Socialist Revolutionaries).
And it was those same Anglo-American and Germanic conservative elitists orchestrating Bolshevik revolutionary "Red" terror against Russia who invented the "Judeo-Bolshevik" myth to conveniently exonerate themselves whilst pandering a new and inverted narrative claiming themselves to be the biggest foes of Communism. Wall Street tycoons from New York and London in the coming decades financed fascist and Nazi movements in the lopsided name of "anti-Communism" and German intel/oligarchy was undoubtedly a directing mastermind behind the elevation of Nazism -- von Bergen himself became an enthusiastic diplomat for Nazi Germany namely as a negotiator in the 1933 Reichskonkordant pact with the Vatican.
Now, yes, it's technically true that a disproportionately large number of Bolshevik leaders were of Jewish background. That said, Jewish revolutionary movements were created in a number of directions both as a direct result of and in direct opposition to the Zubatovist influence over in Eastern Europe/Ukraine setting up controlled opposition "socialist" movements undermining the General Jewish Labor Bund (a.k.a. "Bundists"). Bolshevism spawned as one branch of British-intel-hatched controlled-opposition "revolutionary" sects which became the dominant body, and AFAIK didn't even gain majority Russian Jewish backing until only AFTER the October Revolution, before which most Russian Jews were supportive of Kerensky's Socialist Revolutionaries in alliance with the Bund.
The Bund, BTW, was the primary body of Jewish anti-Zionists in Russia at the time, and were opposed intensely by both the Zionists and Bolsheviks. Lenin was nominally "anti-Zionist" in the sense he wrote something like one tract against Zionism in the 1900s-10s and denounced it as a bourgeois diversion, but ultimately the fact Bolshevism was far more devoted to crushing the influence of the Bund and its aligned Socialist Revolutionaries proved its "anti-Zionism" was gatekeeping, at least in the time of Lenin where hordes of Marxist Zionists among rank-and-file Jewish supporters of Bolshevism mass-emigrated to Palestine and contributed to the Labor Zionist movement. Ultimately, those "Jewish Communists" were tools and not controllers -- it was Anglo-Zubatovism channeling duped Jewish youthful cohorts into Communist movements so they would be set up as useful idiots either as scapegoat or sacrificial lamb.
Another dimension crucial to understand here is that the same Wall Street-MI6-Jesuit-Venetian-Germanic meddlers who funded Bolshevism to usurp Russia were the exact same intel stringpullers who internationalized the "Protocols of Zion" sensation post-1917 claiming that "Bolshevik destruction of Russia validates the Protocols' narrative about a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy." While American and British Scottish Rite Freemasonic leaders nominally supported Alexander Kerensky's Provisional Government produced by the February Revolution in 1917, they behind the scenes never intended for Kerensky to stay and preplanned the Bolshevik Revolution because it was preferable to them that Russia be consumed into a full-on Communist sewer of despotism and serve as a useful boogeyman foil as the much-needed "perpetual enemy" (at least into 1991, but even then the endless geopolitical tension between Anglo-America and Russia has never ceased albeit the switch of exact "reasons").
See, the Anglo-Venetian/Jesuit-Germanic interests had a problem with the Franco-Russian Alliance -- secular Republican France (dominated by the too-independently-minded and non-conservative Grand Orient branch of Freemasonry) and Czarist Russia forged an alliance on mutually beneficial and pro-industrialism interests against Imperial Germany, and this alliance angered both British and Venetian-Jesuit-Vatican geopolitical objectives. The Jesuit movement was devoted to restoring France to the "eldest daughter of the Catholic Church" back into ultramontane theocratic harmony with its longstanding papal mother, and quarreled intensely with the Grand Orient (GODF: "Grand Orient de France") dominated Third Republic. It was, after all, the Jesuits, who launched the notorious "Dreyfus Affair" accusing Jewish French military officer Alfred Dreyfus of treason in a conspiracy to destroy the Third Republic and set up an "integrated Nationalist State" according to ultramontane Catholic ideology in harmony with the Vatican, but the Third Republic exposed the Affair and handed the Jesuits a resounding defeat.
What then? Well, considering the fact the Protocols of Zion borrow obvious themes from French Jesuitry (namely its "Judeo-Masonic" overarching motif that originates out of France, NOT Russia -- plus the fact the Protocols are plagiarized from a French satirical novel by Maurice Joly), one can deduce here that when the Jesuits knew their anti-Dreyfusard plot failed and they weren't in the meantime cir. the 1890s going to destroy the Franco-Russian Alliance from the French side of the equation, they then came into contact with British intel and made sure the Protocols would be translated into Russia and disseminated from the Russian side clandestinely so no one would suspect Jesuit involvement.
Ah, there's just too much to mention here and I've probably already typed too much, lol -- overall, hope this provides a clearer glimpse into the historical analysis, Sarah!
It's the Sabbatean Jewish Supremacist movement that is behind globalism including the UN, the World Economic Forum, the NGOs who do a lot of their dirty work, etc. That said, I'm not convinced that there is a current movement to bring in the Noahide laws…yet. My understanding is that US presidents have signed EOs regarding observance of the Noahide Laws for at least 50 years now. The globalists do want to bring in their one world religion. Their one world religion is Luciferianism, which is grounded in extreme sects of Jewish Mysticism beliefs, so it wouldn't surprise me if the required observance of Noahide Laws are a piece of that.
I became MM (Minion Meryl) leery awhile ago with sending out so many posts, wondering how in a busy schedule she seemed to keep could also write so much. Maybe using AI to write, or a staff peep.
Then her posts not honest about Trump, just protective, and even bigger clue protective of Bob K, Jr especially during the hearings when it showed he had some dishonest ways, did he lie in hearing saying he was pro vxxxx or was he lying to vaxxx damaged children’s parents?
Yep her posts seem to be pretty deceptive and the MAGA/MAHA cult lap it up with NO questions.
100%! She has staff that write the bulk of her articles. And yeah, any supposed journalist who believes Trump and Bobby are going to save us are frankly owned or stupid. The amount of information you can pull off the WEF website about them and their families alone proves they are part of the globalist Cabal. Then, without much effort, you can find out who their biggest oligarch funders were, and trace them back to the WEF.
So glad I found you! I'm also a recovering allopathic RN,CCM, finally learning truth after 60 years of lies. Better late than never, but it sure is lonely out here in the land of truth. Nonetheless it's always reassuring when I find my "baseless" suspicions about certain people well-founded - and Nass has been on my sus radar for a while. I find it best to trust my intuition even if the facts haven't yet been revealed or discovered.
One more thing on Trump and numerology. He was #45, 4+5=9 and now #47, 4+7=11, giving us 9/11. Coincidence? Hmm
Mossad Meryl was dead easy to suss out.
When I saw James Corbett playing along with this stupid fucking IHR bullshit, it made me wonder about that whole CHD Universe.
Which was good.
He absolutely knows better.
When you see Meryl Nass and Abby Rockefeller together at Robert F. Kennedy, Jr's announcement and also Abby appearing on CHD touting Raw Milk, it's like they are daring you to point out the collusion with the richest assholes who run the world.
Mossad Meryl, indeed! What do you mean about Corbett playing along with the IHR bullshit?
The whole purpose of this in my estimation and all that Malone 'INTERNATIONAL HEALTH CRISIS' SUMMIT crap is to make sure that people don't grok the US DOD was running the campaign and if history is any guide, probably in tandem with Israel.
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/james-corbett-and-the-chd-effect
----
Corbett used to go on CHD and participate in this WHO is the baddy bullshit and if ANYBODY knows how the world works top down, it is James Corbett.
This is the same fucking bullshit Operation that CIA Tucker Carlson and Sayanim Bret Weinstein tried to run with "Goliath" pushing poor widddle US around.
Let me know if you need a comp to read some of the links.
You are one based AF methodical writer, Ms. S.
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/the-zelenko-report-featuring-sarg
----
Is it going to shock you if the other big WHO Pied Piper is part of "the Near East Center for Strategic Engagement"?
https://necse.net/about/james-roguski-director-of-research-for-international-health/
Roguski seems to have turned his attention to campaigning to repeal the PREP Act. Is he doing that because he knows it will never happen, given that they're almost certain to go for a 'bird flu' or resurrected-covid* plandemic at the end of this year?
*New variants bustin' out all over ATM, along with new vaxxes.
I'm not sure, but I expect he is doing it because he's looking for a crack in the insanity that would allow the public to prosecute the criminals in the pharmaceutical Cartel. That said, I don't think he has yet gone far enough down the rabbit hole to understand that our politicians and government agencies exist to protect the Cartel (the Medical Industrial Complex) and have never existed to protect the public. Hence, that fight will go absolutely nowhere.
This article was absolutely outstanding.
I’ve been reading Substack articles for a little less than year now, and GreaterIsrahell is correct. I've noted the morass of detail in many, many substacks which overwhelms a reader resulting in zero meaningful input. No conclusions are drawn. The reader is left in a hazy picture steeped in overwhelming fright, fear, or stupefication.
It's well worth noting what the word "stupefy" means. "To dull the senses or capacity to think thereby reducing responsiveness; to stun." A subsidiary meaning is: "Strike dumb, stun with amazement...."
The latter is important because the reader is left in a state of suspended animation wherein they expect resolution from further reports or research but none comes. Conclusions are deliberately not drawn.
The mobile phone accomplishes the same result by the very nature of the instrument if used to understand the world as opposed to simply telephone talk. The individual is left believing that only further research, revelations, and so forth will provide conclusions with steady, unending news flashes on the hour.
The reader either emotes exposing feelings or continues, much as the Q readers did, waiting for answers...for more clarification.
Your article demonstrates that conclusions can be reached with current information available.
It’s taken me nearly a year to arrive at these conclusions, and I’ve participated in many of the psyops not knowing.
One of the best is "nanotech in the blood." While some nanotech may, indeed, be present, the presentation has nearly only included the author as an afflicted victim or a "scientist" with a microscope "reporting." The only net effect has been an overwhelming fear of possible disease arising from this nanotech and an **endless** search for remedies.
Only recently…just a few days ago…did I see a substack which showed our white blood cells encircling and eliminating the "nanotech."
Another tell is the "brittle author response." A criticism is offered not to demean the author but to reply in an unextraordinary fashion to their article. The author returns with a stream of powerful emotions uplifting himself and blasting "his opposition." A secure author never responds in this fashion.
The real, real, real trouble is that incorporated within these articles is some truth along with skewed perceptions. Most people can’t understand that "both/and" apply because everything must be "black/white." Their minds have been structured (current education system, cell phones, Hollywood, etc.) that everything is "all right or all wrong." So, the reader knows one or two points as truth—having seen proof offered elsewhere by someone, like you, who actually researched and brought the receipts. Thus, all the rest of the article must be "true."
Are all these contributors misleading deliberately? I think not. I think many, many people can’t realize the depth and length of misperception and, thus, how much their own thinking and structuring of reality is based upon misperception.
It’s taken me a year, but I’ve learned.
Thank you! And, I agree that there are many people who are trying to report on the truth as they understand it and simply do not yet understand how deep down the rabbit hole they need to go to get to the full truth. I don't for one moment believe I have reached the bottom and have the full truth on any topic. In fact, the more I learn and study, the more I am aware of how little I know. There are many on Substack and other media platforms however who are trying to deceive and whose role it is to confuse and misdirect the public. I will always call those people out when I see them, in hopes some of the people following their information will see more clearly that they can't be trusted. Thanks for your comment and again, thanks for reading my article!
Soviet defector and former KGB operative Yuri Bezmenov warned us about ideological subversion in 1983 when he said:
"What it basically means is, to change the perception of reality, of every American, to such an extent that despite an abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their family, their community and their country."
I think you're absolutely correct. The principle response, both on the Left and Right sides of the political spectrum, is a "deer-in-the-headlights" reaction. Like an old movie playing from film in a canister. The movie jerks to a stop and keeps repeating the same scene. People are largely immobilized. One of the most tragic scenes which has arisen in the last 10 years, more likely in Europe but also present in the U.S., is the the European native who welcomes and freely associates with illegal immigrants under the false notion that multiculturalism and inclusion should be the highest principles followed. These people are mainly women who find themselves beaten and raped...many times by gangs. I note, too, many people who interpret the Christian ideal of "doing unto your neighbor as you would do unto yourself" to mean allowing dangerous criminals near the families. I'm a "true crime" fan and countless stories exist of the woman who befriends someone in a store or bar and ends up murdered, or the family who welcomes a self-confessed criminal into their family by renting a room to them. The remaining family always...always...remarks that she/they "was the kindest person; she would give you the shirt off her back."
The whole thing about Meryl is really simple. If she really wanted to inform me about anything she would send me one e-mail per day, and give me time to digest its contents.
Two years ago when I subscribed to her for a breif period she bombarded me with e-mails about minutia details that are meaningless.
Much like what Glenn greenwald does...... He bombards his audience with details that are spot on, but in the larger picture they are meaningless.
Meryl Nass, Glenn Greenwald, Matt Taibbi and loads more are there for one reason. They are there to try to get your eye off the ball.
👏👏👏Fairly accurate piece.
I recommend anyone in politics or aspiring, actually read Gaddafi's "Green"book. It's excellent and discusses the importance of a country and its people to be free to self determine. It shows his plan that managed to in very short time, turn Libya from poverty dependence, to wealth and independence. And that really angered the BIS, IMF and their profiteers.😉
Re the IHR and WHO. Clarification- because in this game, it's important to be precise, because words have power. The word changes the meaning...like "mandatory"- it doesn't mean what people think it means. It's a contract word. They "Inego Montoya'ed" the crap out of it in 2020.
The "Pandemic Treaty" is a dog and pony show, that was used to distract the masses from the "IHR Amendments", which went through, with barely a blip. Yes your correct in the IHR creation and it being in effect since 1969. But in 2020 they began a process of amendment, and these amendments were significantly different from previous attempts. James Roguski is the expert on these and people should go direct to him for any info, he's a one man army.😉
People need to keep their eyes on the ball- the virus/no virus is a freaking distraction- they don't need a freaking virus do mimic the effects from tech they have already inputted into the eco systems, including humanity. If you do not understand this, I respectfully suggest learning everything you can about the $$32Billion dollar nanotechnology industry, cross reference it with the telecommunications industry research and then factor in biosensors distributed over the last 70 yrs of geoengineering and weather modification programs. "Virus" "Terrain" are weaponised WORDs. And what have we learnt about the importance of words in this game?😉
#follownone #mistakeswereNOTmade #getlocalised
Hi there. Thanks for reading my article and for your comment. I understand your perspective regarding the whole there are viruses - there aren't viruses debate. However, I disagree with the idea that it's unimportant. Considering that almost all vaccines are purported to prevent viral illness and considering that a supposed killer virus was the reason for the 2020 plandemic, I think it's important to dig deep amd work to understand what is true and what isn't. When I first heard people discussing the topic, my initial reaction was similar to yours. However, I think it's important to understand the truth behind such controversies, and after doing some deep investigations and listening to both sides of the argument from a variety of researchers, I've come to the conclusion that virology has zero evidence to support its hypotheses. I've been an RN for 17 years and began my awakening process in 2020. To date, everything I learned in my training and education has proven to be ass-backwards. I began studying holistic medicine in 2020 and reassessing absolutely everything because I went into nursing with a desire to help people to heal and recover their health and wellness. To me, being able to educate people on the fraud that is allopathic medicine is important. You are welcome to your opinion though and I'm grateful for your ability to provide criticism without being mean. ;)
Fair enough, oppinion is important but recognising that it comes from bias, and only makes it true from a certain point of view. I'm actually an alternative health practitioner as well as having personal experience with allopathic medicine and their schooling, and while i inderstand the tantalising "ah ha!" moment for those that come from conventional medical thinking, when they discover terrainism, or alternative medicines more holistic approach, but it doesn't make it anymore truer than germ theory, because neither theories account for the effects of light in ANY of their experiments, "proof", or protecols.🤨 Again, if the 100% critical importance of that statement, does not make sense WHY its so important, then it means that very respectfully, you have made an opinion, based on half information, and set about calling it fact to the masses. Just as "germ theory" advocates did the first time around in history, that we have done this same tired arguements. When you look at the history of both conventional AND alternative medicine, you'll see that this same arguements has occurred before 🤨
Cowan, Kaufmann, Lenka, Bailey, and even Yeadon, and many others in the "no virus" dog show, have conducted great experiments, great analysis of germ theory pony show, but made exactly the same mistakes as their opposition- NONE have accounted for light. Which is precisely why I call it for what it is, a distracting dog and pony show. 😉🤔 It's also why it hasnt really been censored. When something is not allowed to be discussed because it is truth, I promise you, it doesn't get discussed! People think they have been fighting censorship, they have been fighting an illusion of it. Real censorship hasn't even begun in ernest, people don't even know what they don't know.😐
I took the time to comment on your stack, because I think you have a clear eye, to be able to look past the show and noise, to deeper than your peers and help bring that information to the surface, while people are shaking off the pandemic spell.
#folliwnone #mistakeswereNOTmade
Check out this research.
https://kevinwmccairnphd282302.substack.com/p/cadaver-calamari-amyloidogenic-fibrin
The fibrin filaments are created by both the vaccine spike and the virus.
Kevin says it is hard to find uncontaminated blood now unfortunately.
Great! Eye-opening essay.
In the MAHA shenanigans something Bob K Jr has been silent about and something he knows is Trump backing Monsanto//Bayer via a 2019 EO after Bob won a CA case against them. Bob is aware of the EO as he stated it in a podcast pre POTUS rum.
Odd for a product that is known to damage health is not a major MAHA issue. Maybe big corp lobbyist Susie Wiles has something to do with that.
“Trump has publicly aligned himself with pesticide-seed companies to promote the cultivation of GMO crops.”
13 Jun 2019
Center for Food Safety | Press Releases | | CFS Statement: Trump Signs Executive Order to Further Gut Federal GMO Oversight
https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/press-releases/5624/cfs-statement-trump-signs-executive-order-to-further-gut-federal-gmo-oversight
11 Jun 2019
Trump orders simpler path for genetically engineered food
https://apnews.com/article/2895e0f0ef344d16bfcf6f457ed2e759
30 Apr 2019
Trump EPA insists Monsanto's Roundup is safe, despite cancer cases | Monsanto
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/apr/30/monsanto-roundup-trump-epa-cancer
30 Jan 2020
Center for Food Safety | Press Releases | | Siding with Monsanto/Bayer, Trump EPA Once Again Greenlights Roundup
https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/press-releases/5904/siding-with-monsantobayer-trump-epa-once-again-greenlights-roundup
Amazing work, Thank you. God bless you!
It is so depressing the shenanigans going on yet we ought to know the best we can.
I reposted this on my page as I was midway through the first paragraph.
One little thing, in the first paragraph, maybe there is a typo using the word "sew" (like using thread and needle to make clothes) which you might really have meant to write to "sow" (like to sow seeds in the ground to grow) at "They s[o]w disorder"?
Oh, you're right. No, it wasn't a typo, but instead a misspelling. I'll go in and fix it later today. Thanks for pointing out the error!
Thank you for reading my comment and your reply. God bless! :)
The pot they use via the backdoor. The shadow scam.
https://www.theglobalfund.org/en/government/profiles/united-states/
Imho they all r disgusting and evil ..
.their plans have plans
Great work as usual SH. May I recommend J J Couey, PhD as a stellar and bright truth teller and teacher:. You know he's the real deal since his sole support comes from only a hundred or so supporters. The Algos treat him like a lepper.: Gigaohmbiological.com
Hi Steve. I'll check him/her out. Thanks for the recommendation.
Yay Sarah!
It's a 100 year plan: "The compensatory economy provides that when bankers and speculators clean out the people and bring them to their knees, government agencies shall step in and help them up so that they can be fleeced again. This is the function of such agencies as the Securities and Exchange Commission, Reconstruction Finance Corporation and dozens of others. The theory of the compensatory economy supplants all morality in public life, and is responsible for much corruption of the officials in Washington. Thus, also, the predeliction of the international bankers for putting ignorant provincials into key positions is not an idle fancy, and is perhaps reason for much incessant publicity for democracy. It suits the internationals that public officials be of the stupidest type, and the guise of democracy effectively controls them." Eustace Mullins The Federal Reserve Conspiracy, 1954
Amazing article. That is a feat taking this train wreck from its origin up to the present day. I'm saving this one. I find your analysis of this entire debacle to be accurate.
I learned about the DREADD a few years ago from watching Dr. Charles Morgan's video presentation at West Point. I didn't know it was associated with Ivermectin. What is the scoop on that?
What is the scoop on Ivermectin being a DREADD? Is that your question?
Yes. Since I asked that question I found your two stacks on the subject and read them.
Awesome! Let me know if you have additional questions. :)
I"m new to this site. I stumbled onto your site somehow. I've been waking up for about a decade. This is one of the best articles I've ever read. Many thanks.
Proverbs 29:2
"When the righteous are in authority the people flourish, but when the wicked rule the people mourn."
Indeed.
Stan in TN
Hi Stan. Thank you for your encouraging words. So glad we are now connected!
Excellent research, Sarah! Can't even come close describing the pure joy of relief reading your absolutely brilliant summary of the Communist-Zionist connection. I'd say this buried link constitutes one of the most tabooed historical facts stigmatized from serious discussion in light of age-old psyops on the "ultra-antisemitic" end too often hijacking any discussion of Bolshevism and Zionism's interconnect to ostensibly tar "a la association" anyone who mentions this as also instantly suspected of "antisemitism."
Your summary of Russia I agree with almost 100%. Just a side note caveat -- isn't "Europa" that antisemitic psyop film? When approaching the issue of Bolshevism through the lens of an organized outside conspiracy, bear in mind that the age-old Jewish scapegoat is the false diversionary narrative since the true conspirators needed a patsy to absorb the blame. MI6, Wall Street, and Germany facilitated the October Revolution to overthrow Kerensky, and those same entities then blamed "the Jews" for Communism to exonerate themselves. In fact, in Germany, the same Prussian-Freemasonic elites who propelled the Nazis to power in the name of "stamping out Judeo-Bolshevism" were themselves the same conservative reactionaries who in 1917 sent Lenin on the sealed train to destabilize Petrograd.
Agree with your analysis of China (am ethnically Chinese myself and am aware of CPC brainwash legacy in my parents' generation) and Libya; wasn't aware that Mao was actually Rothschild-funded and Zionist-trained. Definitely though I long suspected he was an NWO stooge considering his apparent kinship to Jesuit UN spiritual forefather Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, plus the fact the CPC like all(?) Comintern entities were Fascist collaborationists in the 1930s-40s. The "Communist vs. Nazi" tension is a facade used to cloak both organizational umbrellas' modus operandi as joint heads of a single British Freemasonic synarchist creature used to absorb populist spillover on both the "left" and "right" into controlled opposition sectors unconsciously serving the bidding of Zionist-Masonic Shinar's global Babylonian priesthood while believing they are heralding the onset of a New Age gnosticized utopia.
I have only seen the 1st 2 episodes of the Europa docuseries and it was a couple of years ago, so I may not have picked up on possible psyoppery in what I watched, but the bulk of those 2 episodes was pretty accurate regarding the dirty details of the Bolshevik Revolution. But, yes, I think you're right and the series as a whole appears to be created to stoke the anti-Jewish sentiment the globalists want based on the explanations of some of the other episodes I read when I went back to look at it and grab the link last night. I didn't remember there being 10+ episodes, so that's why I advised my readers that I'm not vouching for the accuracy of the entire series. As you know, you can glean significant truth sometimes from psyop sources. Fall of the Cabal, foe example, had a lot of truth, but was written to promote the Q-Anon
psyop.
Thanks for reading!
Definitely more than welcome; your highly detailed compilations -- I gather -- are worth the equally detailed attention because of the important in-between-the-lines substance and their derived logical conclusions you are evidently very bold at pointing out. (incredibly solid stuff!)
Here's the spoiler to Bolshevism: it's 100% true -- as you point out -- that its architects were from without Russia and the product of a conspiracy to destroy the Czarist-oriented Orthodox Church. Now, just be very incredibly careful about the large majority of sensationalistic Rumble/Bitchute-flooded controlled opposition narratives spinning that into "Jewish ethnicity of Bolshevik leaders" arguments, however, because that mixes fact and fiction into a cyclical dead end.
The true architects of Communism are: Venetian oligarchs, Jesuits, Scottish Rite Freemasonry, MI6, Wall Street, German Prussian aristocrats, Young Turks Zionists, and possibly also the Knights of Malta and Warburgs. Long story short, Trotsky -- funded by Anglo-American financial interests -- was ensured safe travels to Petrograd in 1917 as a result of MI6 securing his release from Halifax detention initially ordered by the MI5, while the Leninist nexus was sent to Petrograd as a result of Young Turks British intel vassal Alexander Parvus (yes, he was "ethnically Jewish," but that doesn't per se prove a "Jewish conspiracy" at some en masse level) coordinating with Jesuit-trained Vatican-German diplomat Diego von Bergen of Imperial Germany's Foreign Office to launch Socialist and Communist terror against Kerensky's Provisional Government and elevate a Bolshevik regime to knock Russia out of WWI (which Lenin did in the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk later in 1918 after by that point already having usurped Russia from the Kerenskyite Socialist Revolutionaries).
And it was those same Anglo-American and Germanic conservative elitists orchestrating Bolshevik revolutionary "Red" terror against Russia who invented the "Judeo-Bolshevik" myth to conveniently exonerate themselves whilst pandering a new and inverted narrative claiming themselves to be the biggest foes of Communism. Wall Street tycoons from New York and London in the coming decades financed fascist and Nazi movements in the lopsided name of "anti-Communism" and German intel/oligarchy was undoubtedly a directing mastermind behind the elevation of Nazism -- von Bergen himself became an enthusiastic diplomat for Nazi Germany namely as a negotiator in the 1933 Reichskonkordant pact with the Vatican.
Now, yes, it's technically true that a disproportionately large number of Bolshevik leaders were of Jewish background. That said, Jewish revolutionary movements were created in a number of directions both as a direct result of and in direct opposition to the Zubatovist influence over in Eastern Europe/Ukraine setting up controlled opposition "socialist" movements undermining the General Jewish Labor Bund (a.k.a. "Bundists"). Bolshevism spawned as one branch of British-intel-hatched controlled-opposition "revolutionary" sects which became the dominant body, and AFAIK didn't even gain majority Russian Jewish backing until only AFTER the October Revolution, before which most Russian Jews were supportive of Kerensky's Socialist Revolutionaries in alliance with the Bund.
The Bund, BTW, was the primary body of Jewish anti-Zionists in Russia at the time, and were opposed intensely by both the Zionists and Bolsheviks. Lenin was nominally "anti-Zionist" in the sense he wrote something like one tract against Zionism in the 1900s-10s and denounced it as a bourgeois diversion, but ultimately the fact Bolshevism was far more devoted to crushing the influence of the Bund and its aligned Socialist Revolutionaries proved its "anti-Zionism" was gatekeeping, at least in the time of Lenin where hordes of Marxist Zionists among rank-and-file Jewish supporters of Bolshevism mass-emigrated to Palestine and contributed to the Labor Zionist movement. Ultimately, those "Jewish Communists" were tools and not controllers -- it was Anglo-Zubatovism channeling duped Jewish youthful cohorts into Communist movements so they would be set up as useful idiots either as scapegoat or sacrificial lamb.
Another dimension crucial to understand here is that the same Wall Street-MI6-Jesuit-Venetian-Germanic meddlers who funded Bolshevism to usurp Russia were the exact same intel stringpullers who internationalized the "Protocols of Zion" sensation post-1917 claiming that "Bolshevik destruction of Russia validates the Protocols' narrative about a Judeo-Masonic conspiracy." While American and British Scottish Rite Freemasonic leaders nominally supported Alexander Kerensky's Provisional Government produced by the February Revolution in 1917, they behind the scenes never intended for Kerensky to stay and preplanned the Bolshevik Revolution because it was preferable to them that Russia be consumed into a full-on Communist sewer of despotism and serve as a useful boogeyman foil as the much-needed "perpetual enemy" (at least into 1991, but even then the endless geopolitical tension between Anglo-America and Russia has never ceased albeit the switch of exact "reasons").
See, the Anglo-Venetian/Jesuit-Germanic interests had a problem with the Franco-Russian Alliance -- secular Republican France (dominated by the too-independently-minded and non-conservative Grand Orient branch of Freemasonry) and Czarist Russia forged an alliance on mutually beneficial and pro-industrialism interests against Imperial Germany, and this alliance angered both British and Venetian-Jesuit-Vatican geopolitical objectives. The Jesuit movement was devoted to restoring France to the "eldest daughter of the Catholic Church" back into ultramontane theocratic harmony with its longstanding papal mother, and quarreled intensely with the Grand Orient (GODF: "Grand Orient de France") dominated Third Republic. It was, after all, the Jesuits, who launched the notorious "Dreyfus Affair" accusing Jewish French military officer Alfred Dreyfus of treason in a conspiracy to destroy the Third Republic and set up an "integrated Nationalist State" according to ultramontane Catholic ideology in harmony with the Vatican, but the Third Republic exposed the Affair and handed the Jesuits a resounding defeat.
What then? Well, considering the fact the Protocols of Zion borrow obvious themes from French Jesuitry (namely its "Judeo-Masonic" overarching motif that originates out of France, NOT Russia -- plus the fact the Protocols are plagiarized from a French satirical novel by Maurice Joly), one can deduce here that when the Jesuits knew their anti-Dreyfusard plot failed and they weren't in the meantime cir. the 1890s going to destroy the Franco-Russian Alliance from the French side of the equation, they then came into contact with British intel and made sure the Protocols would be translated into Russia and disseminated from the Russian side clandestinely so no one would suspect Jesuit involvement.
Ah, there's just too much to mention here and I've probably already typed too much, lol -- overall, hope this provides a clearer glimpse into the historical analysis, Sarah!
Who (or what) do you see as being behind the international movement to bring in the Noahide Laws?
It's the Sabbatean Jewish Supremacist movement that is behind globalism including the UN, the World Economic Forum, the NGOs who do a lot of their dirty work, etc. That said, I'm not convinced that there is a current movement to bring in the Noahide laws…yet. My understanding is that US presidents have signed EOs regarding observance of the Noahide Laws for at least 50 years now. The globalists do want to bring in their one world religion. Their one world religion is Luciferianism, which is grounded in extreme sects of Jewish Mysticism beliefs, so it wouldn't surprise me if the required observance of Noahide Laws are a piece of that.
Good details.
I became MM (Minion Meryl) leery awhile ago with sending out so many posts, wondering how in a busy schedule she seemed to keep could also write so much. Maybe using AI to write, or a staff peep.
Then her posts not honest about Trump, just protective, and even bigger clue protective of Bob K, Jr especially during the hearings when it showed he had some dishonest ways, did he lie in hearing saying he was pro vxxxx or was he lying to vaxxx damaged children’s parents?
Yep her posts seem to be pretty deceptive and the MAGA/MAHA cult lap it up with NO questions.
100%! She has staff that write the bulk of her articles. And yeah, any supposed journalist who believes Trump and Bobby are going to save us are frankly owned or stupid. The amount of information you can pull off the WEF website about them and their families alone proves they are part of the globalist Cabal. Then, without much effort, you can find out who their biggest oligarch funders were, and trace them back to the WEF.
Have noticed her posts hit at a time when a cult distraction is needed.
TY for including the end around WHO funded through USAID, plus. I knew about Gavi, not the other.
Need to follow up better on the WEF info you mentioned. The cult squirms when replying with facts.
So glad I found you! I'm also a recovering allopathic RN,CCM, finally learning truth after 60 years of lies. Better late than never, but it sure is lonely out here in the land of truth. Nonetheless it's always reassuring when I find my "baseless" suspicions about certain people well-founded - and Nass has been on my sus radar for a while. I find it best to trust my intuition even if the facts haven't yet been revealed or discovered.
One more thing on Trump and numerology. He was #45, 4+5=9 and now #47, 4+7=11, giving us 9/11. Coincidence? Hmm