25 Comments
Mar 16·edited Mar 16Liked by Sarah E. Lawton, BSN, RN, CCM

thank you for taking such a close look at these "studies" on masterpiece. i didn't notice it and i would also call it fraud. that's ridiculous with the 3 people. I used to use zeolite for classic detoxification for mercury, lead etc. Dr. Klinghard has also been using it successfully for a long time. I thought it could also be helpful against nanotechnology. But I have changed my mind.

Firstly, because Dr. Milhacea has found that the blood does not improve with zeolite.

Secondly, she also revealed that zeolite is an excellent building block for polymers and nanosensors - as has been extensively documented in the literature.

"When someone shows you tests where the levels of graphene and polymers have supposedly decreased in the extracellular fluid, it doesn't tell you much because the materials penetrate the cells and build biosensing/synthetic biological function intracellularly."

Third, the assumption that what we find in the blood is graphene oxide is wrong. It is hydrogel polymer synthetics, as Clifford Carnicom and Mihalcea have shown in extensive testing.

I personally think it is dangerous to take Masterpiece. I think this nanoized zeolite accelerates the self-assembly of the graphene oxide nanoparticle hydrogels (which they call spike protein) even more than normal zeolite. It could hit like a bomb.

Expand full comment
author

Good morning. You're welcome! I'm glad I was able to learn and provide the information. I sent the article to the company and to Dr. Young and I hope it will give them a push to tell the truth. So, I was not sure what they were calling the "spike protein," I just knew it wasn't a viral spike glycoprotein. Now, I understand. Venoms also have spike glycoproteins on their cell membranes. These psychopaths love their word games. The spike protein is being made in the gut via the DNA plasmids, which are in the food supply, water supply, and likely is being sprayed in the air. I'm a pretty good researcher and my understanding has been that graphene is necessary to build the intrabody network that hooks us up to the Internet of Things/Internet of Bodies. It's stronger than steel and is a superconductor of electricity which boosts the signal so the cloud can access our biometric data and eventually hook us all up to AI. That said, I'm always willing to revise my thinking if I see new evidence that changes what I believe to be true. Do you have anything you can share that demonstrates there is no graphene?

Expand full comment
Mar 16Liked by Sarah E. Lawton, BSN, RN, CCM

hello, i am curious to see if dr nixon reacts to this, i will continue to observe it. At first I believed the fairy tale that the injections contain mrna and that this gets into the cells and the ribosomes produce the spike. I had to completely revise my way of thinking. My statement with graphs was not quite clear. I am not saying that there is no graphene, but only a small part of it. Quote from Dr. Ana "43:24 Some claim this hydrogel is graphene oxide. You can't see graphene oxide! It is only one atom thick, a monoatomic layer. It is the hydrogel that organizes itself. It contains graphene but you can't see it! It is nonsense!

Some say we have the solution for graphene. The quantum dots can be as small as 6 nm, but I think they can be at least 30 nm.

So as they get bigger, you may see them, or as they start to clump or gather, your people may see the blinking, which could be the quantum dots they see. There are polymer-coated particles that can be as small as 500 nm. That's where we get closer to the things we can see."

So what is meant is that when we see structures in the microscope, they are much larger than graphene. It would therefore be wrong to think that it would be enough to detox graphene. In this interview, Karen said that they use polyethylene glycol because it is biocompatible and is not broken down by the immune system. (timestamp 11:05 )

She says "Spike proteins are graphene oxide nanoparticle hydrogels. At 31:00"

we are dealing with complex structures. "They say we are making chimeric Spike protein. Wir going to make species from multiple animals“.(39:44)

there is talk of bats, snakes, cockroaches. And then there is the intelligence that builds up this nanonetwork. I have to admit that there's so much input for me that I can't decide what we're dealing with. At the moment I only believe what we see under the microscope.

the quotes are from this interview: https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/c19-bioweapons-and-brain-computer

Expand full comment
author

Hey there. I believed the mRNA was making the spike protein too initially until we found out that there was no mRNA in the vials. You're absolutely right that the hydrogels and the graphene are distinctly different. The graphene has a different directive. It builds the neural network in the brain and boosts the signal for the Quantum Dot nanotechnology that enables your brain to connect with AI and enables the cloud to pick up your biometric data. It also enables downloading of data from the cloud. The hydrogels are what the died suddenly white clots are made from. I had a tough time making up my mind regarding what the spike protein was too. Now, I am absolutely convinced that they are referring to the spike glycoprotein found on venom peptides. Dr. Carlo Brogna and his team in Italy have found 36 different snake and conotoxin venoms in the blood, urine, and stool of ALL their COVID19 "infected" patients and their vaccine-injured patients. Dr. Chetty out of South Africa found venoms in the stool of ALL his long haulers patients and states he saw via microscopy that the DNA plasmids, that we know were in the vials, are actually what makes the "spike protein." This makes a lot of sense for so many reasons. If I could encourage you to go to my Substack and read the article "Treating Bioweapon Exposure" I think it will show you the facts that prove Dr. Ardis' venom theory.

Expand full comment
Mar 17·edited Mar 17Liked by Sarah E. Lawton, BSN, RN, CCM

thanks sarah, i will read the substack because i am not yet familiar with the poisons. I would like to come back to the zeolite. After the initial shock, I took another look at the studies that Dr. ana linked. I think you really have to take a closer look here!

Daskaloff has confirmed on the basis of isotope labeling studies that clinoptilolite zeolite is not absorbed in the human intestine but is excreted.

Otherwise you are comparing apples with oranges. There are synthetic and natural zeolites.

One study here talks about clinoptilolite and zeolite beta polymorph A (BEA).

One Study mention "Graphene quantum dot incorporation in the zeolitic imidazolate framework with sodalite (SOD) topology. Graphene quantum dot (GQD) and zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) were synthesized.“

ZIF glasses can be synthesized by the melt-quench method, and the first melt-quenched ZIF glass was firstly made and reported by Bennett et al. back in 2015. (wiki)

„the PXRD pattern verified the synthesis of ZIF-8(Fe) with a sod-like structure that sized consistently at 36.10 nm“ Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1387700322008668

here you work with technical zeolites of the subclass "metal-organic frameworks (MOF)" with a size of 35nm.

I suspect that the study by dr ana also works on this scale.

In this size range, they can probably act as a catalyst. But natural zeolites in micrometer size do not get into the bloodstream and i have my doubts that they are a catalyst because of their size.

I can't say anything about the liquid, nanoized zeolite in Masterpiece. However, I would still be skeptical here.

Liquid "zeolites" are not really zeolites and do not offer any benefit to the human body. says this source:

https://www.zeohealth.com/aboutzeolite/liquidvspowder.html

„eolite is a solid by nature. Its health benefits are a result of its cage-like structure and its natural occurring negative charge. That negative charge allows Zeolite to attract positively charged metals and toxins like a magnet, trap them in its cage-like structure and draw them out of the body. Any manipulation of this solid (such as making it liquid), destroys the beneficial cage-like structure and negative charge, rendering what's left (a pool of elements) useless and possibly even dangerous.“

Expand full comment
author

Good morning. Yes, sir, I am still studying the zeolite to better understand the various types and sizes, and how they work. It isn't just the uses enhancing graphene that has me concerned. It is also how zeolite increases the activity of hydrogels. While zeolite may help with removing metals from the blood, there is other data suggesting it pools heavy metals in the organs, especially the brain. Thank you for the article. I will check it out!

Expand full comment
May 29Liked by Sarah E. Lawton, BSN, RN, CCM

Hallo Sarah how are you? I have just discovered new information about masterpiece. it is a microscopic examination. I remembered our conversation and that you confronted Matt Hazen with an article by Dr. Ana. You can take a look at it, it will exceed your worst fears. But I can't guarantee its authenticity. best regards michael https://unhackableanimal.substack.com/p/masterpeace-take-some-nanos-to-detox

Expand full comment
Jun 7Liked by Sarah E. Lawton, BSN, RN, CCM

We know the Detox for the vaccine...... I also have A LOT of inside information on both Dr. Young and Love..... https://agentmidnightrider.substack.com/p/the-covid-kill-switch-by-agent-midnight For graphene use NAC laquinta columna detox.

Expand full comment
author

Hi. I have no doubt they are both dirty, but my focus is more on solutions for those who are sick rather than calling out the grifters. Do you have a link for the NAC detox info from La Quinta Columna, please? Thanks for your comment!

Expand full comment
Apr 11Liked by Sarah E. Lawton, BSN, RN, CCM

We know now that zeolite pulls the tech into the hydrogel and makes things worse ! New Dr. Ana video!

Expand full comment
Mar 25Liked by Sarah E. Lawton, BSN, RN, CCM

I love your tenacity, research, and critical thinking skills. Soooo important. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Mar 13Liked by Sarah E. Lawton, BSN, RN, CCM

You can tell immediately by the way the guy responds but especially becomes enlightening in his later responses to you over email that he can't even keep any of it straight and then he gets defensive. These are all the hallmarks of a fraudulent human being. So many of these people out there 🙇‍♀️

Expand full comment
Apr 1·edited Apr 9

MasterPeace is wonderful and my husband is a testament of what MasterPeace can do. He has gone for live blood cell analysis and his heavy metals have been reduced . We sleep better and dream now as well. We will continue to take MasterPeace. I will be getting the live blood cell anyalsis slides this week on his results and presenting to the FB group. He has been on MasterPeace for 6 months and he is NOT apart of the clinical study.

Expand full comment
author

The piece was not about whether or not the product is potentially helpful. The post was about fabricating what the results of their so-called study showed in order to sell products.

Expand full comment

i love it too been taking it for months. it severely reduced in the graphene in my body. i’ve been on dr ariyana detox for months and it saved my life, i was having severe heart pain from shedding. i’m sick of ppl trying to get a story by harrassing these people who are saving humanity. this woman is upset because she miscommunjcated with matt about the products used and BTW you don’t need all the emf blocking tech or the powder i only used the liquid bottle and it lasts two- three months!!!! for 50$ that’s a deal! ITS NATURAL ZEOLITE not synthetic that’s the difference this zeolite is not sourced with graphene unlike the ones other ppl promote. your edta is what’s hurting ppl and destroying dna. Leave natural health alone we don’t do big pharma

Expand full comment

Hello Bubba,

It helped my husband tremendously remove forever chemicals and regain his health. You are spot on about Ria. Its sad and unfortuneate that people like her mislead others. The testimonials are astounding for MasterPeacre. My 27 year old daughter has been taking it. She could never sleep before because of her ADHD and now she is. She says she can focus and concentrtae more as well.

Expand full comment
author

Hi Heather. I thought zeolite products would be helpful too, and was excited when I heard about the Masterpeace product. I had followed Dr. Young's blog for a few years prior to hearing him discuss the product. However, we must all be reassessing what we think we know in the age of bioweapons. I don't know what the intentions are behind everyone's decisions and claims. I'm not in their heads, so I can’t assume they are all knowingly working to mislead people. However, if you read the articles, you should understand why I have a problem with this company and the claims being made. I would have had a problem with the claims even if I hadn't begun digging into zeolites to understand whether or not they could be helpful. Dr. Ana Mihalcea's article in my post should explain some of my concerns with the zeolites post-C19, but there is a tremendous amount of information on why zeolites are not helpful if you are willing to consider new information. Consider listening to this and you may understand more behind my thinking.

https://rumble.com/v3rt7nv-so-you-think-zeolite-is-good-hahahaha.html

Expand full comment

sounds like you’re harrassing them. get a life. i did have more intense dreams on it and it did detox my pineal gland. your pharmaceuticals are what’s hurting ppl, leave natural options alone you clearly can’t handle anything that doesn’t have a fraud science lie attached to it

Expand full comment
author

Good morning. Everything I recommend is a natural substance, with the exception of methylene blue. If you read the articles, and studied everything included in them, you would know that.

Expand full comment

Hi did Robert young respond to this concerning email chain ?

I stuck up for you in the masterpeace Facebook group. Your narrative is calm, logical and issue focused Matt’s responses are very emotionally charged, painting anyone who asks valid questions as an “attacker” - it’s a shame - it puts everything into question. I very much want to believe that masterpeace is everything he says it is , but we’ve been lied to all our lives about.. everything. We can trust but we must verify too.

Expand full comment
author

Hi Peter. Thanks for your comment and for sticking up for me in the FB group. It really is a shame. My intention is not to cause problems. It is however, to expose severe dishonesty when it has been identified. No, Dr. Young didn't respond. I emailed him the article and shared my experience with Hazen, but never received a response. He has had ample opportunity to respond, which seems to further validate my concerns, but I guess could be related to a full inbox and the possibility he didn't see it. Interestingly, Hazen emailed me yesterday to complain about various parts of the article. These emails were even worse, highly emotional and irrational, and I had to kind of threaten him, advising that he was stepping over the line of harassment before he stopped. It made me consider that Hazen may be the majority of the problem, here. I remember the first disclaimer video, where he was wearing a maroon shirt and clearly stated that the subjects in the trial took the MasterPeace, MasterRestore, and wore the EMF device, so I'm about 99.9% sure he updated the video. In addition, he added the phrasing, "we cannot claim that you will begin dreaming again," on the revised disclaimer video, which he totally claimed during the Tuesday meeting I attended. If that would have been said in the first disclaimer video, that would have instantly made my radar go up when he was claiming that exact thing in the meeting on Tuesday evening. I think I will try to reach out to Dr. Young one more time. I've had a lot of respect for Dr. Young and have learned a lot from him over the past few years, so all of this is pretty troubling, but sadly, it has become the truth behind so much in Western medicine. Absolutely, we need to trust but still verify. And, when unable to verify, we cannot allow trust in a person or product to override legitimate concerns.

Expand full comment
RemovedMay 17Liked by Sarah E. Lawton, BSN, RN, CCM
Comment removed
Expand full comment
author

Woah. I knew he had gotten in trouble at some point, but wow, I didn't know all of that! I'll email you in the morning. Thanks for your comment and social media info.

Expand full comment