thank you for taking such a close look at these "studies" on masterpiece. i didn't notice it and i would also call it fraud. that's ridiculous with the 3 people. I used to use zeolite for classic detoxification for mercury, lead etc. Dr. Klinghard has also been using it successfully for a long time. I thought it could also be helpful against nanotechnology. But I have changed my mind.
Firstly, because Dr. Milhacea has found that the blood does not improve with zeolite.
Secondly, she also revealed that zeolite is an excellent building block for polymers and nanosensors - as has been extensively documented in the literature.
"When someone shows you tests where the levels of graphene and polymers have supposedly decreased in the extracellular fluid, it doesn't tell you much because the materials penetrate the cells and build biosensing/synthetic biological function intracellularly."
Third, the assumption that what we find in the blood is graphene oxide is wrong. It is hydrogel polymer synthetics, as Clifford Carnicom and Mihalcea have shown in extensive testing.
I personally think it is dangerous to take Masterpiece. I think this nanoized zeolite accelerates the self-assembly of the graphene oxide nanoparticle hydrogels (which they call spike protein) even more than normal zeolite. It could hit like a bomb.
Good morning. You're welcome! I'm glad I was able to learn and provide the information. I sent the article to the company and to Dr. Young and I hope it will give them a push to tell the truth. So, I was not sure what they were calling the "spike protein," I just knew it wasn't a viral spike glycoprotein. Now, I understand. Venoms also have spike glycoproteins on their cell membranes. These psychopaths love their word games. The spike protein is being made in the gut via the DNA plasmids, which are in the food supply, water supply, and likely is being sprayed in the air. I'm a pretty good researcher and my understanding has been that graphene is necessary to build the intrabody network that hooks us up to the Internet of Things/Internet of Bodies. It's stronger than steel and is a superconductor of electricity which boosts the signal so the cloud can access our biometric data and eventually hook us all up to AI. That said, I'm always willing to revise my thinking if I see new evidence that changes what I believe to be true. Do you have anything you can share that demonstrates there is no graphene?
hello, i am curious to see if dr nixon reacts to this, i will continue to observe it. At first I believed the fairy tale that the injections contain mrna and that this gets into the cells and the ribosomes produce the spike. I had to completely revise my way of thinking. My statement with graphs was not quite clear. I am not saying that there is no graphene, but only a small part of it. Quote from Dr. Ana "43:24 Some claim this hydrogel is graphene oxide. You can't see graphene oxide! It is only one atom thick, a monoatomic layer. It is the hydrogel that organizes itself. It contains graphene but you can't see it! It is nonsense!
Some say we have the solution for graphene. The quantum dots can be as small as 6 nm, but I think they can be at least 30 nm.
So as they get bigger, you may see them, or as they start to clump or gather, your people may see the blinking, which could be the quantum dots they see. There are polymer-coated particles that can be as small as 500 nm. That's where we get closer to the things we can see."
So what is meant is that when we see structures in the microscope, they are much larger than graphene. It would therefore be wrong to think that it would be enough to detox graphene. In this interview, Karen said that they use polyethylene glycol because it is biocompatible and is not broken down by the immune system. (timestamp 11:05 )
She says "Spike proteins are graphene oxide nanoparticle hydrogels. At 31:00"
we are dealing with complex structures. "They say we are making chimeric Spike protein. Wir going to make species from multiple animals“.(39:44)
there is talk of bats, snakes, cockroaches. And then there is the intelligence that builds up this nanonetwork. I have to admit that there's so much input for me that I can't decide what we're dealing with. At the moment I only believe what we see under the microscope.
Hey there. I believed the mRNA was making the spike protein too initially until we found out that there was no mRNA in the vials. You're absolutely right that the hydrogels and the graphene are distinctly different. The graphene has a different directive. It builds the neural network in the brain and boosts the signal for the Quantum Dot nanotechnology that enables your brain to connect with AI and enables the cloud to pick up your biometric data. It also enables downloading of data from the cloud. The hydrogels are what the died suddenly white clots are made from. I had a tough time making up my mind regarding what the spike protein was too. Now, I am absolutely convinced that they are referring to the spike glycoprotein found on venom peptides. Dr. Carlo Brogna and his team in Italy have found 36 different snake and conotoxin venoms in the blood, urine, and stool of ALL their COVID19 "infected" patients and their vaccine-injured patients. Dr. Chetty out of South Africa found venoms in the stool of ALL his long haulers patients and states he saw via microscopy that the DNA plasmids, that we know were in the vials, are actually what makes the "spike protein." This makes a lot of sense for so many reasons. If I could encourage you to go to my Substack and read the article "Treating Bioweapon Exposure" I think it will show you the facts that prove Dr. Ardis' venom theory.
I think that what they have been calling "mRNA" is not messenger RNA, which is how most of the public and the medical community interpret that term. These words all have several meanings. What the globalists mean when they say "mRNA" is nanotechnology that is capable or building synthetic mRNA (foreign proteins) usung the body's own cellular materials. Just like, when they say "virus," they are not referring to a microorganism, whether naturally occurring or that has been enhanced via gain-of-function mutation. When they say "virus," they are referring to a man-made toxin or venom which is the Latin definition. So, it's a type of a red herring, but one whereby the term they are usung has more than one definition.
thanks sarah, i will read the substack because i am not yet familiar with the poisons. I would like to come back to the zeolite. After the initial shock, I took another look at the studies that Dr. ana linked. I think you really have to take a closer look here!
Daskaloff has confirmed on the basis of isotope labeling studies that clinoptilolite zeolite is not absorbed in the human intestine but is excreted.
Otherwise you are comparing apples with oranges. There are synthetic and natural zeolites.
One study here talks about clinoptilolite and zeolite beta polymorph A (BEA).
One Study mention "Graphene quantum dot incorporation in the zeolitic imidazolate framework with sodalite (SOD) topology. Graphene quantum dot (GQD) and zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) were synthesized.“
ZIF glasses can be synthesized by the melt-quench method, and the first melt-quenched ZIF glass was firstly made and reported by Bennett et al. back in 2015. (wiki)
here you work with technical zeolites of the subclass "metal-organic frameworks (MOF)" with a size of 35nm.
I suspect that the study by dr ana also works on this scale.
In this size range, they can probably act as a catalyst. But natural zeolites in micrometer size do not get into the bloodstream and i have my doubts that they are a catalyst because of their size.
I can't say anything about the liquid, nanoized zeolite in Masterpiece. However, I would still be skeptical here.
Liquid "zeolites" are not really zeolites and do not offer any benefit to the human body. says this source:
„eolite is a solid by nature. Its health benefits are a result of its cage-like structure and its natural occurring negative charge. That negative charge allows Zeolite to attract positively charged metals and toxins like a magnet, trap them in its cage-like structure and draw them out of the body. Any manipulation of this solid (such as making it liquid), destroys the beneficial cage-like structure and negative charge, rendering what's left (a pool of elements) useless and possibly even dangerous.“
Good morning. Yes, sir, I am still studying the zeolite to better understand the various types and sizes, and how they work. It isn't just the uses enhancing graphene that has me concerned. It is also how zeolite increases the activity of hydrogels. While zeolite may help with removing metals from the blood, there is other data suggesting it pools heavy metals in the organs, especially the brain. Thank you for the article. I will check it out!
Hallo Sarah how are you? I have just discovered new information about masterpiece. it is a microscopic examination. I remembered our conversation and that you confronted Matt Hazen with an article by Dr. Ana. You can take a look at it, it will exceed your worst fears. But I can't guarantee its authenticity. best regards michael https://unhackableanimal.substack.com/p/masterpeace-take-some-nanos-to-detox
Hi. I have no doubt they are both dirty, but my focus is more on solutions for those who are sick rather than calling out the grifters. Do you have a link for the NAC detox info from La Quinta Columna, please? Thanks for your comment!
Too much riding on Ana and her "team" for the whole world to stop researching on main nano tech detoxer ie ZEOLITE..outside EDTA..For all we know their all in mind controlled cahoots,Ana belongs to a Cult that openly advises channeling/ downloading spirits in a trance state ie Ram-tha(who swears and advises witchy wine,drunk parties,seriously) and others...that's disqualifying for this level of science fact that needs to be solid ,period and you know it in your heart as does God above and your readers that see your good heart Sarah...too much riding to bet it all on few strangers research
Again,Sarah please ,redo studies yourself with unique touch and study and speak to most dignified proponents who have microscopes and know their case for it in detail.. and block Ana and friends for awhile..if it comes back nanos building faster fine..you can beef up their case for world and they'll thank you for it...if not you dodge us from a hellish mislead and we all start using natural zeolite more healthy and human then ever...what do you have to lose,it's all big gain either way!
Ok last point today,it's apparent that the nanotech is designed to feed on minerals and other body element so to some degree it's guaranteed that zeolite as well especially contains aluminum and metals will be fed on and will build some degree of nano.
But the larger question is will the sum total of built nano be less when taking zeolite or approx the same.
If zeolite is a massive binder of aluminum and it's only active in that binding for a 12-48 hour period mostly ie 90+% with maybe some residual binding occuring later then in metal most feared to add to nanotech, aluminum it seems there'd be a potential gain loss of aluminum even though aluminum is contained in zeolite.Also cuz aluminum is in a very bound form it seems unlikely that it would disintegrate well to be bound by nanotech.if zeolite disintegrated so it could not posess strongest binding qualities...so evidence it largely stays bound is strong...which leaves only possibility zeolite can be utilized in whole form by nanobots as the only real danger...I would think simple easy blood vial and petri dish experiments with vaxxed blood would answer that question rapidly the only way to know,not trusting Anas team ie Carnicon, others ..needs isolation from them...many not trusting Ana or those guys for too many reasons to go into now but worse in total then Young issues.
Please contact me ria@longhulers.world I have so much evidence on these guys. Caroline Mansfield is NOT a doctor she worked for me in one of my clinics, she is a live blood analyst that saw a max of 3 patients a month. She also lied about the 3 patients, she was one of them and was on multiple products. Matt Haxen is linked to mRNA and Dr Robert Young is not a doctor.....
In January 2014, Young and two associates were arrested and charged with multiple counts of grand theft and conspiring to practice medicine without a license. The San Diego District Attorney’s press release stated that Young accepted patients, including some who were terminally ill, and temporarily housed them at his pH Miracle ranch [14]. The charges alleged that Young and his associates broke the law when they went beyond advocating dietary changes and administered intravenous treatments to patients, some of whom were terminally ill. In February 2016, following a 2-month trial, he was convicted of two counts of practicing medicine without a license. During the trial, Deputy District Attorney Gina Darvas portrayed Young as a charlatan who preyed on the sick and vulnerable—including dying cancer patients—and duped them with bogus science [3]. A few weeks after the trial ended, Darvas announced that Young would be re-tried on the charges for which the jury was unable to reach a verdict [15]. In 2017, faced with the possibility of retrial, Young pleaded guilty to two more counts of practicing medicine without a license. The plea agreement called for a 44-month sentence, some of which had already been served under house arrest [16]. It also contained this statement:
I, Robert O. Young, declare freely and voluntarily, under penalty of perjury that
I do not have any post high-school educational degrees from any accredited schools.
I am not a Microbiologist.
I am not a Hematologist.
I am not a Medical Doctor.
I am not a Naturopathic Doctor.
I am not a trained scientist [17].
In June 2017, the judge issued the sentence and expressed hope that Young would not repeat what he did in the future [18].
Woah. I knew he had gotten in trouble at some point, but wow, I didn't know all of that! I'll email you in the morning. Thanks for your comment and social media info.
Because they are now Big Pharma 2.0. McCullough and team are just a repackaged version of Big Pharma that keeps humanity using their toxic products convinced that these poisons will help them regain their health.
You can tell immediately by the way the guy responds but especially becomes enlightening in his later responses to you over email that he can't even keep any of it straight and then he gets defensive. These are all the hallmarks of a fraudulent human being. So many of these people out there 🙇♀️
Why are you so quick to call this fraud? Have you tried the product? I have been using it for about a month and I feel better than ever. Pains I have had for years have disappeared and I feel healthy.
Hi Kimbra. It's fraud because they are lying about the so-called study. That said, we now have absolute proof that zeolites increase the activity of the nanotechnology. Zeolites were weaponized because the creators of the nanotech knew it would be a popular solution to attempt to remove it. Here is researcher Maria Crisler showing you what happens when zeolites are added to the nanotech. https://www.facebook.com/share/v/TrbQmmdiE7S9CRfB/
Any study of just 3 people is ridiculous,9 minimum is the hallmark and really 20 + to really tell well,100+ to get to irrefutable level.
To those claiming results from Young product I'd just say that's not unexpected,it does bond out,but also strengthens heavier nano tech already in body and potentially by some tests contains graphene itself so who care about initial cleansing benefits your feeding a monster growing inside you!
MasterPeace is wonderful and my husband is a testament of what MasterPeace can do. He has gone for live blood cell analysis and his heavy metals have been reduced . We sleep better and dream now as well. We will continue to take MasterPeace. I will be getting the live blood cell anyalsis slides this week on his results and presenting to the FB group. He has been on MasterPeace for 6 months and he is NOT apart of the clinical study.
The piece was not about whether or not the product is potentially helpful. The post was about fabricating what the results of their so-called study showed in order to sell products.
Sarah,So glad I found you,your ivermectin articles focusing on brain damage needs to be spread far and wide,your levels of great investigative ability is tops but your replys too low so I suggest you spend a week or so just advertising your wares ie crisscross replys and links to the top 20 NANO/ Holistic stacks etc and consider Rumble,bitchute as well as your voice on ivermectin is a brain barrier blaster with toxins release is desperately needed.
Wondering if fenbendazol or other antiparasitics are safe enough ?
Lastly Bubba's claim that natural zeolite vs synthetic is safe or safer needs a clear response backed by evidence...where does that stand now?
I'd like to help promote you...please reply with answers asap,I'll make it many times worth your while...You rate in top 3 I've found so far in your subject matter and good ,smart approach,only read 35 minutes of your stuff so far,love it!
Actually it's about #1 feeding nanotech in long run danger not about cleansing of various metals long causing problems I'm certain that benefit occurs..#2 3 person study is inherently unscientificly small subject to fraud and fraud was found when picked at..3# they use synthetic materials partly or interchangeably according to my studies and then back it if true...if not true for sure stick w #1 and 2# is my advice.
I don't trust Ana on this issue or many ,she she doesn't differentiate qualities of vitamin c or EDTA well ie promoting GMO C and EDTA cream that fails study's unlike other types that passes...possible she's a complex shill or partly controlled unknown to even her..you though look real good so far..I think all forms of zeolites and related products, especially natural should be looked at individually..
Simple experiment could be too get some zeolite and mix with graphene under a slide..maybe add some blood or infected nano blood ,let sit for awhile with clean slide ir petri dish next to it and compare..or inject same into a frog or rat...hate to do it but works has to know,video experiment and Post!...Trust no one Ana is bad on some issues to be sure ie cultist,etc...info releaser yes..and on point majority yes ..not enuff in her case.. somethings going on w her not right,think your right though!!
So if not zeolite then what's your current protocol short and long list?
i love it too been taking it for months. it severely reduced in the graphene in my body. i’ve been on dr ariyana detox for months and it saved my life, i was having severe heart pain from shedding. i’m sick of ppl trying to get a story by harrassing these people who are saving humanity. this woman is upset because she miscommunjcated with matt about the products used and BTW you don’t need all the emf blocking tech or the powder i only used the liquid bottle and it lasts two- three months!!!! for 50$ that’s a deal! ITS NATURAL ZEOLITE not synthetic that’s the difference this zeolite is not sourced with graphene unlike the ones other ppl promote. your edta is what’s hurting ppl and destroying dna. Leave natural health alone we don’t do big pharma
Bubba, does it not concern you that "dr" Young presented himself as various types of doctors when in fact he is none of them at all? That alone is a deal breaker for me.
It helped my husband tremendously remove forever chemicals and regain his health. You are spot on about Ria. Its sad and unfortuneate that people like her mislead others. The testimonials are astounding for MasterPeacre. My 27 year old daughter has been taking it. She could never sleep before because of her ADHD and now she is. She says she can focus and concentrtae more as well.
Hi Heather. I thought zeolite products would be helpful too, and was excited when I heard about the Masterpeace product. I had followed Dr. Young's blog for a few years prior to hearing him discuss the product. However, we must all be reassessing what we think we know in the age of bioweapons. I don't know what the intentions are behind everyone's decisions and claims. I'm not in their heads, so I can’t assume they are all knowingly working to mislead people. However, if you read the articles, you should understand why I have a problem with this company and the claims being made. I would have had a problem with the claims even if I hadn't begun digging into zeolites to understand whether or not they could be helpful. Dr. Ana Mihalcea's article in my post should explain some of my concerns with the zeolites post-C19, but there is a tremendous amount of information on why zeolites are not helpful if you are willing to consider new information. Consider listening to this and you may understand more behind my thinking.
I believe Dr Young knows a great deal more about cancer than you do. With regard to his product for nanotechnology I don't know but I'm willing to learn. We have Dr Ana with EDTA and vitamin C IV and Dr Ardis with nicotine and Dr Pedro Chavez with chlorine dioxide, (Dr Chavez has treated over 6.000 Vaxxx injured patients). I have been using chlorine dioxide for over 5 years so I am somewhat familiar. It seems there are enormous egos at play here,
Hi Stuart. Maybe he does, but my beef with him isn't over his ideas on cancer treatment. It's over his lies regarding the study he has been quoting and the zeolite products that enhance the activity of the nanotech. You're welcome to believe what you want, but my critiques have nothing to do with belief and everything to do with evidence and truth. Here is Maria Crisler demonstrating what effect zeolites have on the nanotechnology.
Link is down,what did she find nutshell version..videos?
Sarah,there's shill plants everywhere,could it be still true some versions of zeolites resists nano build?...I get it ,when they flip the frequency switch is when you find out if your nano load is too high ie critical mass brain takeover...I suggest replicating the experiments yourself ,only way to know as zeolites targeted to be sure ..either way...see?
sounds like you’re harrassing them. get a life. i did have more intense dreams on it and it did detox my pineal gland. your pharmaceuticals are what’s hurting ppl, leave natural options alone you clearly can’t handle anything that doesn’t have a fraud science lie attached to it
Good morning. Everything I recommend is a natural substance, with the exception of methylene blue. If you read the articles, and studied everything included in them, you would know that.
Hi did Robert young respond to this concerning email chain ?
I stuck up for you in the masterpeace Facebook group. Your narrative is calm, logical and issue focused Matt’s responses are very emotionally charged, painting anyone who asks valid questions as an “attacker” - it’s a shame - it puts everything into question. I very much want to believe that masterpeace is everything he says it is , but we’ve been lied to all our lives about.. everything. We can trust but we must verify too.
Hi Peter. Thanks for your comment and for sticking up for me in the FB group. It really is a shame. My intention is not to cause problems. It is however, to expose severe dishonesty when it has been identified. No, Dr. Young didn't respond. I emailed him the article and shared my experience with Hazen, but never received a response. He has had ample opportunity to respond, which seems to further validate my concerns, but I guess could be related to a full inbox and the possibility he didn't see it. Interestingly, Hazen emailed me yesterday to complain about various parts of the article. These emails were even worse, highly emotional and irrational, and I had to kind of threaten him, advising that he was stepping over the line of harassment before he stopped. It made me consider that Hazen may be the majority of the problem, here. I remember the first disclaimer video, where he was wearing a maroon shirt and clearly stated that the subjects in the trial took the MasterPeace, MasterRestore, and wore the EMF device, so I'm about 99.9% sure he updated the video. In addition, he added the phrasing, "we cannot claim that you will begin dreaming again," on the revised disclaimer video, which he totally claimed during the Tuesday meeting I attended. If that would have been said in the first disclaimer video, that would have instantly made my radar go up when he was claiming that exact thing in the meeting on Tuesday evening. I think I will try to reach out to Dr. Young one more time. I've had a lot of respect for Dr. Young and have learned a lot from him over the past few years, so all of this is pretty troubling, but sadly, it has become the truth behind so much in Western medicine. Absolutely, we need to trust but still verify. And, when unable to verify, we cannot allow trust in a person or product to override legitimate concerns.
Sarah,again you've given too much credit to Dr Young and associates on 3 person study...too low a number ie nearly a one person study haha!...Everyone knows Young is a bit of a sheister salesman AND THEY DONT CARE! their desperate and they see real evidence that the used car he's selling is actually going to work.
Consider shifting away therefore your defense,offense to: insufficient numbered study...I'll not dignify it one word beyond that in future!!!! to dodge that whole silly mess your not winning in replys notice...Then cite 2 or 3 evidences of nano builder or contains graphene in anas study...but try to duplicate it...I know,if you find it and you post it it's a battle again but that battle is worth fighting cuz you reverberate integrity more then any of these people you cite..lol
But seriously,to fulfill righteousness here...you need to compare natural vs synthetic versions and look for contamination half and half cheating in young's zeolites product..cuz he is part sheister salesman short on virtues..but he's also part brilliant solo scientist self trained finding truths so it's not is he superman or the the joker it's is he right sometimes despite his partly bad self...his partner looks like a more serious not so good guy...I suggest also finding the other one or 2 top zeolite products that claim no synthetics..then do the testing your self ...your in deep..only way to know for sure youve not been misled yourself..ie you know for a fact it's true:IF ZEOLITE NON SYNTHETICS DONT BUILD NANO MORE THEN DEPLETES THEM AND THEY REMOVE ALL METALS SOME THAT ELITES WOULD HAVE IN PLACE A STRATEGY TO TRICK ITS NONUSE INTO HAPPENING -- YOU MAY HAVE BEEN TRICKED...all of your evidence is few solo researcher based,their isolated from scrutiny..see what I mean...you have to admit it's not an impossibility...you need to do the testing yourself and arrange it so it's witnessed or filmed...only way to bet the whole farm safely here Sarah...such a important issue to humanity...you may be the one to alot of hope,I feel it..Don't forget GoFundMe and like...you'll get it if you ask right and right places.For microscopes, cameras, equipment needed,etc
thank you for taking such a close look at these "studies" on masterpiece. i didn't notice it and i would also call it fraud. that's ridiculous with the 3 people. I used to use zeolite for classic detoxification for mercury, lead etc. Dr. Klinghard has also been using it successfully for a long time. I thought it could also be helpful against nanotechnology. But I have changed my mind.
Firstly, because Dr. Milhacea has found that the blood does not improve with zeolite.
Secondly, she also revealed that zeolite is an excellent building block for polymers and nanosensors - as has been extensively documented in the literature.
"When someone shows you tests where the levels of graphene and polymers have supposedly decreased in the extracellular fluid, it doesn't tell you much because the materials penetrate the cells and build biosensing/synthetic biological function intracellularly."
Third, the assumption that what we find in the blood is graphene oxide is wrong. It is hydrogel polymer synthetics, as Clifford Carnicom and Mihalcea have shown in extensive testing.
I personally think it is dangerous to take Masterpiece. I think this nanoized zeolite accelerates the self-assembly of the graphene oxide nanoparticle hydrogels (which they call spike protein) even more than normal zeolite. It could hit like a bomb.
Good morning. You're welcome! I'm glad I was able to learn and provide the information. I sent the article to the company and to Dr. Young and I hope it will give them a push to tell the truth. So, I was not sure what they were calling the "spike protein," I just knew it wasn't a viral spike glycoprotein. Now, I understand. Venoms also have spike glycoproteins on their cell membranes. These psychopaths love their word games. The spike protein is being made in the gut via the DNA plasmids, which are in the food supply, water supply, and likely is being sprayed in the air. I'm a pretty good researcher and my understanding has been that graphene is necessary to build the intrabody network that hooks us up to the Internet of Things/Internet of Bodies. It's stronger than steel and is a superconductor of electricity which boosts the signal so the cloud can access our biometric data and eventually hook us all up to AI. That said, I'm always willing to revise my thinking if I see new evidence that changes what I believe to be true. Do you have anything you can share that demonstrates there is no graphene?
hello, i am curious to see if dr nixon reacts to this, i will continue to observe it. At first I believed the fairy tale that the injections contain mrna and that this gets into the cells and the ribosomes produce the spike. I had to completely revise my way of thinking. My statement with graphs was not quite clear. I am not saying that there is no graphene, but only a small part of it. Quote from Dr. Ana "43:24 Some claim this hydrogel is graphene oxide. You can't see graphene oxide! It is only one atom thick, a monoatomic layer. It is the hydrogel that organizes itself. It contains graphene but you can't see it! It is nonsense!
Some say we have the solution for graphene. The quantum dots can be as small as 6 nm, but I think they can be at least 30 nm.
So as they get bigger, you may see them, or as they start to clump or gather, your people may see the blinking, which could be the quantum dots they see. There are polymer-coated particles that can be as small as 500 nm. That's where we get closer to the things we can see."
So what is meant is that when we see structures in the microscope, they are much larger than graphene. It would therefore be wrong to think that it would be enough to detox graphene. In this interview, Karen said that they use polyethylene glycol because it is biocompatible and is not broken down by the immune system. (timestamp 11:05 )
She says "Spike proteins are graphene oxide nanoparticle hydrogels. At 31:00"
we are dealing with complex structures. "They say we are making chimeric Spike protein. Wir going to make species from multiple animals“.(39:44)
there is talk of bats, snakes, cockroaches. And then there is the intelligence that builds up this nanonetwork. I have to admit that there's so much input for me that I can't decide what we're dealing with. At the moment I only believe what we see under the microscope.
the quotes are from this interview: https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/c19-bioweapons-and-brain-computer
Hey there. I believed the mRNA was making the spike protein too initially until we found out that there was no mRNA in the vials. You're absolutely right that the hydrogels and the graphene are distinctly different. The graphene has a different directive. It builds the neural network in the brain and boosts the signal for the Quantum Dot nanotechnology that enables your brain to connect with AI and enables the cloud to pick up your biometric data. It also enables downloading of data from the cloud. The hydrogels are what the died suddenly white clots are made from. I had a tough time making up my mind regarding what the spike protein was too. Now, I am absolutely convinced that they are referring to the spike glycoprotein found on venom peptides. Dr. Carlo Brogna and his team in Italy have found 36 different snake and conotoxin venoms in the blood, urine, and stool of ALL their COVID19 "infected" patients and their vaccine-injured patients. Dr. Chetty out of South Africa found venoms in the stool of ALL his long haulers patients and states he saw via microscopy that the DNA plasmids, that we know were in the vials, are actually what makes the "spike protein." This makes a lot of sense for so many reasons. If I could encourage you to go to my Substack and read the article "Treating Bioweapon Exposure" I think it will show you the facts that prove Dr. Ardis' venom theory.
So you think the MRNA might have just been a Red Herring to throw people off track and make them look in the wrong places for an antidote?
I think that what they have been calling "mRNA" is not messenger RNA, which is how most of the public and the medical community interpret that term. These words all have several meanings. What the globalists mean when they say "mRNA" is nanotechnology that is capable or building synthetic mRNA (foreign proteins) usung the body's own cellular materials. Just like, when they say "virus," they are not referring to a microorganism, whether naturally occurring or that has been enhanced via gain-of-function mutation. When they say "virus," they are referring to a man-made toxin or venom which is the Latin definition. So, it's a type of a red herring, but one whereby the term they are usung has more than one definition.
thanks sarah, i will read the substack because i am not yet familiar with the poisons. I would like to come back to the zeolite. After the initial shock, I took another look at the studies that Dr. ana linked. I think you really have to take a closer look here!
Daskaloff has confirmed on the basis of isotope labeling studies that clinoptilolite zeolite is not absorbed in the human intestine but is excreted.
Otherwise you are comparing apples with oranges. There are synthetic and natural zeolites.
One study here talks about clinoptilolite and zeolite beta polymorph A (BEA).
One Study mention "Graphene quantum dot incorporation in the zeolitic imidazolate framework with sodalite (SOD) topology. Graphene quantum dot (GQD) and zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) were synthesized.“
ZIF glasses can be synthesized by the melt-quench method, and the first melt-quenched ZIF glass was firstly made and reported by Bennett et al. back in 2015. (wiki)
„the PXRD pattern verified the synthesis of ZIF-8(Fe) with a sod-like structure that sized consistently at 36.10 nm“ Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1387700322008668
here you work with technical zeolites of the subclass "metal-organic frameworks (MOF)" with a size of 35nm.
I suspect that the study by dr ana also works on this scale.
In this size range, they can probably act as a catalyst. But natural zeolites in micrometer size do not get into the bloodstream and i have my doubts that they are a catalyst because of their size.
I can't say anything about the liquid, nanoized zeolite in Masterpiece. However, I would still be skeptical here.
Liquid "zeolites" are not really zeolites and do not offer any benefit to the human body. says this source:
https://www.zeohealth.com/aboutzeolite/liquidvspowder.html
„eolite is a solid by nature. Its health benefits are a result of its cage-like structure and its natural occurring negative charge. That negative charge allows Zeolite to attract positively charged metals and toxins like a magnet, trap them in its cage-like structure and draw them out of the body. Any manipulation of this solid (such as making it liquid), destroys the beneficial cage-like structure and negative charge, rendering what's left (a pool of elements) useless and possibly even dangerous.“
Good morning. Yes, sir, I am still studying the zeolite to better understand the various types and sizes, and how they work. It isn't just the uses enhancing graphene that has me concerned. It is also how zeolite increases the activity of hydrogels. While zeolite may help with removing metals from the blood, there is other data suggesting it pools heavy metals in the organs, especially the brain. Thank you for the article. I will check it out!
Hallo Sarah how are you? I have just discovered new information about masterpiece. it is a microscopic examination. I remembered our conversation and that you confronted Matt Hazen with an article by Dr. Ana. You can take a look at it, it will exceed your worst fears. But I can't guarantee its authenticity. best regards michael https://unhackableanimal.substack.com/p/masterpeace-take-some-nanos-to-detox
We know the Detox for the vaccine...... I also have A LOT of inside information on both Dr. Young and Love..... https://agentmidnightrider.substack.com/p/the-covid-kill-switch-by-agent-midnight For graphene use NAC laquinta columna detox.
Hi. I have no doubt they are both dirty, but my focus is more on solutions for those who are sick rather than calling out the grifters. Do you have a link for the NAC detox info from La Quinta Columna, please? Thanks for your comment!
https://www.orwell.city/2021/07/NAC-glutathione.html?ysclid=lwj5z5g5tl582805946
Intel Courtesy of .................>>>#Agentmidnightrider
#Navalintelligence
#Spaceforce
Also, Cross Check Intel with CBD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bz4fn2QFO_A
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abi6110
https://redemperorcbd.com/cbd-glutathione-and-graphene-oxide/
Too much riding on Ana and her "team" for the whole world to stop researching on main nano tech detoxer ie ZEOLITE..outside EDTA..For all we know their all in mind controlled cahoots,Ana belongs to a Cult that openly advises channeling/ downloading spirits in a trance state ie Ram-tha(who swears and advises witchy wine,drunk parties,seriously) and others...that's disqualifying for this level of science fact that needs to be solid ,period and you know it in your heart as does God above and your readers that see your good heart Sarah...too much riding to bet it all on few strangers research
Again,Sarah please ,redo studies yourself with unique touch and study and speak to most dignified proponents who have microscopes and know their case for it in detail.. and block Ana and friends for awhile..if it comes back nanos building faster fine..you can beef up their case for world and they'll thank you for it...if not you dodge us from a hellish mislead and we all start using natural zeolite more healthy and human then ever...what do you have to lose,it's all big gain either way!
Oops meant will the sum total of built nanotech be less when taking zeolite,same or more..
Ok last point today,it's apparent that the nanotech is designed to feed on minerals and other body element so to some degree it's guaranteed that zeolite as well especially contains aluminum and metals will be fed on and will build some degree of nano.
But the larger question is will the sum total of built nano be less when taking zeolite or approx the same.
If zeolite is a massive binder of aluminum and it's only active in that binding for a 12-48 hour period mostly ie 90+% with maybe some residual binding occuring later then in metal most feared to add to nanotech, aluminum it seems there'd be a potential gain loss of aluminum even though aluminum is contained in zeolite.Also cuz aluminum is in a very bound form it seems unlikely that it would disintegrate well to be bound by nanotech.if zeolite disintegrated so it could not posess strongest binding qualities...so evidence it largely stays bound is strong...which leaves only possibility zeolite can be utilized in whole form by nanobots as the only real danger...I would think simple easy blood vial and petri dish experiments with vaxxed blood would answer that question rapidly the only way to know,not trusting Anas team ie Carnicon, others ..needs isolation from them...many not trusting Ana or those guys for too many reasons to go into now but worse in total then Young issues.
Please contact me ria@longhulers.world I have so much evidence on these guys. Caroline Mansfield is NOT a doctor she worked for me in one of my clinics, she is a live blood analyst that saw a max of 3 patients a month. She also lied about the 3 patients, she was one of them and was on multiple products. Matt Haxen is linked to mRNA and Dr Robert Young is not a doctor.....
In January 2014, Young and two associates were arrested and charged with multiple counts of grand theft and conspiring to practice medicine without a license. The San Diego District Attorney’s press release stated that Young accepted patients, including some who were terminally ill, and temporarily housed them at his pH Miracle ranch [14]. The charges alleged that Young and his associates broke the law when they went beyond advocating dietary changes and administered intravenous treatments to patients, some of whom were terminally ill. In February 2016, following a 2-month trial, he was convicted of two counts of practicing medicine without a license. During the trial, Deputy District Attorney Gina Darvas portrayed Young as a charlatan who preyed on the sick and vulnerable—including dying cancer patients—and duped them with bogus science [3]. A few weeks after the trial ended, Darvas announced that Young would be re-tried on the charges for which the jury was unable to reach a verdict [15]. In 2017, faced with the possibility of retrial, Young pleaded guilty to two more counts of practicing medicine without a license. The plea agreement called for a 44-month sentence, some of which had already been served under house arrest [16]. It also contained this statement:
I, Robert O. Young, declare freely and voluntarily, under penalty of perjury that
I do not have any post high-school educational degrees from any accredited schools.
I am not a Microbiologist.
I am not a Hematologist.
I am not a Medical Doctor.
I am not a Naturopathic Doctor.
I am not a trained scientist [17].
In June 2017, the judge issued the sentence and expressed hope that Young would not repeat what he did in the future [18].
I have so much evidence - I exposed a lot on my page https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100068922816380
Woah. I knew he had gotten in trouble at some point, but wow, I didn't know all of that! I'll email you in the morning. Thanks for your comment and social media info.
I feel the same about the Wellness Corporation. Selling high priced vitamins. hmmm....
Because they are now Big Pharma 2.0. McCullough and team are just a repackaged version of Big Pharma that keeps humanity using their toxic products convinced that these poisons will help them regain their health.
We know now that zeolite pulls the tech into the hydrogel and makes things worse ! New Dr. Ana video!
I love your tenacity, research, and critical thinking skills. Soooo important. Thank you.
You can tell immediately by the way the guy responds but especially becomes enlightening in his later responses to you over email that he can't even keep any of it straight and then he gets defensive. These are all the hallmarks of a fraudulent human being. So many of these people out there 🙇♀️
Why are you so quick to call this fraud? Have you tried the product? I have been using it for about a month and I feel better than ever. Pains I have had for years have disappeared and I feel healthy.
Hi Kimbra. It's fraud because they are lying about the so-called study. That said, we now have absolute proof that zeolites increase the activity of the nanotechnology. Zeolites were weaponized because the creators of the nanotech knew it would be a popular solution to attempt to remove it. Here is researcher Maria Crisler showing you what happens when zeolites are added to the nanotech. https://www.facebook.com/share/v/TrbQmmdiE7S9CRfB/
Any study of just 3 people is ridiculous,9 minimum is the hallmark and really 20 + to really tell well,100+ to get to irrefutable level.
To those claiming results from Young product I'd just say that's not unexpected,it does bond out,but also strengthens heavier nano tech already in body and potentially by some tests contains graphene itself so who care about initial cleansing benefits your feeding a monster growing inside you!
MasterPeace is wonderful and my husband is a testament of what MasterPeace can do. He has gone for live blood cell analysis and his heavy metals have been reduced . We sleep better and dream now as well. We will continue to take MasterPeace. I will be getting the live blood cell anyalsis slides this week on his results and presenting to the FB group. He has been on MasterPeace for 6 months and he is NOT apart of the clinical study.
The piece was not about whether or not the product is potentially helpful. The post was about fabricating what the results of their so-called study showed in order to sell products.
Sarah,So glad I found you,your ivermectin articles focusing on brain damage needs to be spread far and wide,your levels of great investigative ability is tops but your replys too low so I suggest you spend a week or so just advertising your wares ie crisscross replys and links to the top 20 NANO/ Holistic stacks etc and consider Rumble,bitchute as well as your voice on ivermectin is a brain barrier blaster with toxins release is desperately needed.
Wondering if fenbendazol or other antiparasitics are safe enough ?
Lastly Bubba's claim that natural zeolite vs synthetic is safe or safer needs a clear response backed by evidence...where does that stand now?
I'd like to help promote you...please reply with answers asap,I'll make it many times worth your while...You rate in top 3 I've found so far in your subject matter and good ,smart approach,only read 35 minutes of your stuff so far,love it!
Actually it's about #1 feeding nanotech in long run danger not about cleansing of various metals long causing problems I'm certain that benefit occurs..#2 3 person study is inherently unscientificly small subject to fraud and fraud was found when picked at..3# they use synthetic materials partly or interchangeably according to my studies and then back it if true...if not true for sure stick w #1 and 2# is my advice.
I don't trust Ana on this issue or many ,she she doesn't differentiate qualities of vitamin c or EDTA well ie promoting GMO C and EDTA cream that fails study's unlike other types that passes...possible she's a complex shill or partly controlled unknown to even her..you though look real good so far..I think all forms of zeolites and related products, especially natural should be looked at individually..
Simple experiment could be too get some zeolite and mix with graphene under a slide..maybe add some blood or infected nano blood ,let sit for awhile with clean slide ir petri dish next to it and compare..or inject same into a frog or rat...hate to do it but works has to know,video experiment and Post!...Trust no one Ana is bad on some issues to be sure ie cultist,etc...info releaser yes..and on point majority yes ..not enuff in her case.. somethings going on w her not right,think your right though!!
So if not zeolite then what's your current protocol short and long list?
i love it too been taking it for months. it severely reduced in the graphene in my body. i’ve been on dr ariyana detox for months and it saved my life, i was having severe heart pain from shedding. i’m sick of ppl trying to get a story by harrassing these people who are saving humanity. this woman is upset because she miscommunjcated with matt about the products used and BTW you don’t need all the emf blocking tech or the powder i only used the liquid bottle and it lasts two- three months!!!! for 50$ that’s a deal! ITS NATURAL ZEOLITE not synthetic that’s the difference this zeolite is not sourced with graphene unlike the ones other ppl promote. your edta is what’s hurting ppl and destroying dna. Leave natural health alone we don’t do big pharma
Bubba, does it not concern you that "dr" Young presented himself as various types of doctors when in fact he is none of them at all? That alone is a deal breaker for me.
Hello Bubba,
It helped my husband tremendously remove forever chemicals and regain his health. You are spot on about Ria. Its sad and unfortuneate that people like her mislead others. The testimonials are astounding for MasterPeacre. My 27 year old daughter has been taking it. She could never sleep before because of her ADHD and now she is. She says she can focus and concentrtae more as well.
Hi Heather. I thought zeolite products would be helpful too, and was excited when I heard about the Masterpeace product. I had followed Dr. Young's blog for a few years prior to hearing him discuss the product. However, we must all be reassessing what we think we know in the age of bioweapons. I don't know what the intentions are behind everyone's decisions and claims. I'm not in their heads, so I can’t assume they are all knowingly working to mislead people. However, if you read the articles, you should understand why I have a problem with this company and the claims being made. I would have had a problem with the claims even if I hadn't begun digging into zeolites to understand whether or not they could be helpful. Dr. Ana Mihalcea's article in my post should explain some of my concerns with the zeolites post-C19, but there is a tremendous amount of information on why zeolites are not helpful if you are willing to consider new information. Consider listening to this and you may understand more behind my thinking.
https://rumble.com/v3rt7nv-so-you-think-zeolite-is-good-hahahaha.html
Amen!
I believe Dr Young knows a great deal more about cancer than you do. With regard to his product for nanotechnology I don't know but I'm willing to learn. We have Dr Ana with EDTA and vitamin C IV and Dr Ardis with nicotine and Dr Pedro Chavez with chlorine dioxide, (Dr Chavez has treated over 6.000 Vaxxx injured patients). I have been using chlorine dioxide for over 5 years so I am somewhat familiar. It seems there are enormous egos at play here,
Hi Stuart. Maybe he does, but my beef with him isn't over his ideas on cancer treatment. It's over his lies regarding the study he has been quoting and the zeolite products that enhance the activity of the nanotech. You're welcome to believe what you want, but my critiques have nothing to do with belief and everything to do with evidence and truth. Here is Maria Crisler demonstrating what effect zeolites have on the nanotechnology.
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/TrbQmmdiE7S9CRfB/
Link is down,what did she find nutshell version..videos?
Sarah,there's shill plants everywhere,could it be still true some versions of zeolites resists nano build?...I get it ,when they flip the frequency switch is when you find out if your nano load is too high ie critical mass brain takeover...I suggest replicating the experiments yourself ,only way to know as zeolites targeted to be sure ..either way...see?
sounds like you’re harrassing them. get a life. i did have more intense dreams on it and it did detox my pineal gland. your pharmaceuticals are what’s hurting ppl, leave natural options alone you clearly can’t handle anything that doesn’t have a fraud science lie attached to it
Good morning. Everything I recommend is a natural substance, with the exception of methylene blue. If you read the articles, and studied everything included in them, you would know that.
Hi did Robert young respond to this concerning email chain ?
I stuck up for you in the masterpeace Facebook group. Your narrative is calm, logical and issue focused Matt’s responses are very emotionally charged, painting anyone who asks valid questions as an “attacker” - it’s a shame - it puts everything into question. I very much want to believe that masterpeace is everything he says it is , but we’ve been lied to all our lives about.. everything. We can trust but we must verify too.
Hi Peter. Thanks for your comment and for sticking up for me in the FB group. It really is a shame. My intention is not to cause problems. It is however, to expose severe dishonesty when it has been identified. No, Dr. Young didn't respond. I emailed him the article and shared my experience with Hazen, but never received a response. He has had ample opportunity to respond, which seems to further validate my concerns, but I guess could be related to a full inbox and the possibility he didn't see it. Interestingly, Hazen emailed me yesterday to complain about various parts of the article. These emails were even worse, highly emotional and irrational, and I had to kind of threaten him, advising that he was stepping over the line of harassment before he stopped. It made me consider that Hazen may be the majority of the problem, here. I remember the first disclaimer video, where he was wearing a maroon shirt and clearly stated that the subjects in the trial took the MasterPeace, MasterRestore, and wore the EMF device, so I'm about 99.9% sure he updated the video. In addition, he added the phrasing, "we cannot claim that you will begin dreaming again," on the revised disclaimer video, which he totally claimed during the Tuesday meeting I attended. If that would have been said in the first disclaimer video, that would have instantly made my radar go up when he was claiming that exact thing in the meeting on Tuesday evening. I think I will try to reach out to Dr. Young one more time. I've had a lot of respect for Dr. Young and have learned a lot from him over the past few years, so all of this is pretty troubling, but sadly, it has become the truth behind so much in Western medicine. Absolutely, we need to trust but still verify. And, when unable to verify, we cannot allow trust in a person or product to override legitimate concerns.
Sarah,again you've given too much credit to Dr Young and associates on 3 person study...too low a number ie nearly a one person study haha!...Everyone knows Young is a bit of a sheister salesman AND THEY DONT CARE! their desperate and they see real evidence that the used car he's selling is actually going to work.
Consider shifting away therefore your defense,offense to: insufficient numbered study...I'll not dignify it one word beyond that in future!!!! to dodge that whole silly mess your not winning in replys notice...Then cite 2 or 3 evidences of nano builder or contains graphene in anas study...but try to duplicate it...I know,if you find it and you post it it's a battle again but that battle is worth fighting cuz you reverberate integrity more then any of these people you cite..lol
But seriously,to fulfill righteousness here...you need to compare natural vs synthetic versions and look for contamination half and half cheating in young's zeolites product..cuz he is part sheister salesman short on virtues..but he's also part brilliant solo scientist self trained finding truths so it's not is he superman or the the joker it's is he right sometimes despite his partly bad self...his partner looks like a more serious not so good guy...I suggest also finding the other one or 2 top zeolite products that claim no synthetics..then do the testing your self ...your in deep..only way to know for sure youve not been misled yourself..ie you know for a fact it's true:IF ZEOLITE NON SYNTHETICS DONT BUILD NANO MORE THEN DEPLETES THEM AND THEY REMOVE ALL METALS SOME THAT ELITES WOULD HAVE IN PLACE A STRATEGY TO TRICK ITS NONUSE INTO HAPPENING -- YOU MAY HAVE BEEN TRICKED...all of your evidence is few solo researcher based,their isolated from scrutiny..see what I mean...you have to admit it's not an impossibility...you need to do the testing yourself and arrange it so it's witnessed or filmed...only way to bet the whole farm safely here Sarah...such a important issue to humanity...you may be the one to alot of hope,I feel it..Don't forget GoFundMe and like...you'll get it if you ask right and right places.For microscopes, cameras, equipment needed,etc