I’ve been scouring media and research looking for products that can help the bioweapon-injured and bioweapon-exposed. I saw a video with Dr. Robert Young where he was promoting MasterPeace as a potential “antidote” for the nanotechnology contamination of the world. In this interview, Dr. Young touts an initial study with 3 people that supposedly demonstrated that 90 days on MasterPeace decreased graphene by 92%.
After listening to this interview, I decided to go to the MasterPeace website to learn more about the product. In order to access the website’s information, I had to sign up as an affiliate for the company. I was immediately introduced to a disclaimer video. In that video, Matthew Hazen, the product’s creator, explained that in the MasterPeace study, there were 3 people who they started on three different products. They placed them on MasterPeace, a zeolite solution, MasterRestore, a zeolite powder, and an EMF shielding device. He stated that there was a 90% reduction in graphene in all 3 people in the supposed “study.” This was my first concern. Hazen appears to have updated this video as of 3/13/2024, and changed what he said regarding the study in the last couple of days; he did so because of our interactions over the past week. I called out the company’s fraud and advised him I would be writing this article and would allow him to respond prior to posting it.
On the YouTube platform, it appears that the video has been updated recently, because there have only been 7 likes, and there are no comments though it has gotten more than 500 views. I may be wrong, as I only listened to the disclaimer video once, but when I went back to relisten this morning, it seems to be a slightly different video. That said, what he is saying is STILL problematic and points to poor science at best, and fraud, at worst.
Matt Hazen backpedaling and changing what he says about the MasterPeace study is a pattern, as you will learn shortly.
Study design is everything in research. I became concerned after watching the disclaimer video because Dr. Young hadn’t mentioned that the supposed “study” evaluated three subjects who were started on three different products all at once; rather, Young stated that MasterPeace alone had given the results he was touting. In research, it is important to limit variables that can affect the research’s conclusions. When trying to determine what a product does and does not do, you have to begin by looking at each product individually. Even in poorly designed research, like this study would be, if you placed all three subjects on three products, when discussing the so-called “results,” you would need to admit, that the results were based on three products working together. This is not what Young, Hazen, and the study’s researcher, Dr. Carolyn Mansfield are doing. They are claiming that MasterPeace alone was responsible for these results.
I then looked at the pricing for beginning a protocol with all three products, since that is actually what was studied. MasterPeace is $52.99 for a 2 month supply. MasterRestore is $64.99, and I’m not sure how long a single container is supposed to last. If you buy MasterPeace and MasterRestore together, the price is $111.00. When you click on the MasterRestore product, it explains that they are intended to be purchased together.
The EMF shielding device, is called FLFE, or Focused Life Force Energy. It is priced as a monthly subscription after a 15 day free trial. After the free trial period, it is $36 a month to continue the service.
From the 28:29 part of this video, Dr. Young states he perceives that MasterPeace is the “antidote” to nanotechnology contamination. He further states the MasterPeace product is a solution to “demagnetize” the nanotechnology rendering it inert. He goes on to call this product, “a miracle.” Later, he promotes his pHmiracle product, called Terra pHirma, which costs another $50+ after tax. He promotes a couple of his books as solutions to cancer, also for purchase on his website. He then promotes another product called pHour Salts, which costs another $40. If you add all of this together, Young’s interview promotes a total of 5 products and books, which if purchased, cost well over $200.
In addition, Young finishes his interview talking about the importance of truth and honesty. He explains that he is “a man of God.” Um, Dr. Young, then why aren’t you being fully honest?
I attended a meeting with 75 other people on MasterPeace’s website with Matthew Hazen. During this meeting, contrary to his disclaimer video above, he makes the exact claim he stated they could not state, “you will begin dreaming again.” He said, “MasterPeace decalcifies the pineal gland.” I was able to ask some questions during this 2 hour meeting. I asked about the study, and requested he explain why the original disclaimer video said that the subjects were started on three products. This was his answer…I am paraphrasing.
“All three subjects were not fully complaint with their supplement regimen. Only one person took their supplements as prescribed, and the other two basically failed to participate. Dr. Young is setting up a new 90 day study to look at MasterPeace alone and we will be looking forward to getting those results.”
I then asked if there was any evidence to suggest these products degraded the hydrogel died-suddenly clots. He said, “yes, absolutely” with zero evidence this was true.
After attending the MasterPeace meeting, I was pretty upset. For all of the claims these people are making regarding their desire to help humanity, their behavior says that is not their actual intent. I emailed Hazen requesting more information and asked for him to send me the actual study paper so I could examine the study design. He did not send me a paper, but instead, this was his response.
This was not the information that was requested, and so I continued to request the study.
Hazen then changes his story regarding the subjects and states all 3 were compliant with their MasterPeace dosage, though he says that Subjects 2 and 3 added the zeolite powder in the last 2 weeks of the “study.”
I then responded with:
To which, Hazen responded:
I responded to this with the following:
The interview I found is below. Dr. Carolyn Mansfield is also being dishonest regarding the study. She designed the study and did the research, so there is no excuse for her behavior. It is fraud to lie, or withhold portions of the truth when explaining what a study did and did not show. Here is a recent interview with Dr. Mansfield, so you can see what I’m talking about. Around the 19:40 mark, she explains that she didn’t want to conflate the experiment’s results [with lifestyle changes or added supplements], because she wanted to see what the MasterPeace product, “did on its own.” Um, Doc, then you shouldn’t have been testing 3 different products all at once without first testing each product individually. At 20:40, she states, “we are just testing purely for MasterPeace at this point,” which according to Hazen is a bold-faced lie, even if you accept his final changed story. 2 subjects took the zeolite powder for the last 2 weeks, so how did this not affect their supposed results?
I responded to Matt’s email again, saying the following:
To which, he responded:
I didn’t want to talk with him. What could he possibly say to make this okay? And, I responded:
The emailing continued:
Young’s/Hazen’s rebuttal discusses the idea that nanosized zeolite is special, and that it does not enhance the activity of graphene. This was not even what I was most concerned about, but okay, so maybe it doesn’t enhance graphene. Does that change the absolute fraud of contending that a single product gave the touted “miracle” results? No!
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/what-are-the-four-s-s-when-evaluating-any-zeolite-construct
Supplement fraud is rampant in the US, as is pharmaceutical fraud. People shopping for products to help treat illness or improve health are generally stuck accepting claims of researchers at face value. When you have so many unethical researchers putting out fraudulent claims, it is very much a buyer-beware scenario. I was initially excited to learn more about MasterPeace and the company behind it. Wow, was it an eye-opening, disappointing experience, but a great learning experience nonetheless. If you are considering options for treatment to detox and deactivate nanotech or forever chemicals, I would caution you to consider the truth behind the claims these people are making. If they are lying about so many things, how can you trust anything they say? How can you trust the data? I don’t know if they could pay off the lab to give them falsified results or not, but at this point, I don’t a trust a word these people say.
Buyers beware, indeed.
If you would like more information on what is working to detox and cleanse the body from nanotechnology, and degrade the died-suddenly hydrogel clots, this article will point you to some potential solutions that are based in scientific study, from truthful, caring providers.
thank you for taking such a close look at these "studies" on masterpiece. i didn't notice it and i would also call it fraud. that's ridiculous with the 3 people. I used to use zeolite for classic detoxification for mercury, lead etc. Dr. Klinghard has also been using it successfully for a long time. I thought it could also be helpful against nanotechnology. But I have changed my mind.
Firstly, because Dr. Milhacea has found that the blood does not improve with zeolite.
Secondly, she also revealed that zeolite is an excellent building block for polymers and nanosensors - as has been extensively documented in the literature.
"When someone shows you tests where the levels of graphene and polymers have supposedly decreased in the extracellular fluid, it doesn't tell you much because the materials penetrate the cells and build biosensing/synthetic biological function intracellularly."
Third, the assumption that what we find in the blood is graphene oxide is wrong. It is hydrogel polymer synthetics, as Clifford Carnicom and Mihalcea have shown in extensive testing.
I personally think it is dangerous to take Masterpiece. I think this nanoized zeolite accelerates the self-assembly of the graphene oxide nanoparticle hydrogels (which they call spike protein) even more than normal zeolite. It could hit like a bomb.
Please contact me ria@longhulers.world I have so much evidence on these guys. Caroline Mansfield is NOT a doctor she worked for me in one of my clinics, she is a live blood analyst that saw a max of 3 patients a month. She also lied about the 3 patients, she was one of them and was on multiple products. Matt Haxen is linked to mRNA and Dr Robert Young is not a doctor.....
In January 2014, Young and two associates were arrested and charged with multiple counts of grand theft and conspiring to practice medicine without a license. The San Diego District Attorney’s press release stated that Young accepted patients, including some who were terminally ill, and temporarily housed them at his pH Miracle ranch [14]. The charges alleged that Young and his associates broke the law when they went beyond advocating dietary changes and administered intravenous treatments to patients, some of whom were terminally ill. In February 2016, following a 2-month trial, he was convicted of two counts of practicing medicine without a license. During the trial, Deputy District Attorney Gina Darvas portrayed Young as a charlatan who preyed on the sick and vulnerable—including dying cancer patients—and duped them with bogus science [3]. A few weeks after the trial ended, Darvas announced that Young would be re-tried on the charges for which the jury was unable to reach a verdict [15]. In 2017, faced with the possibility of retrial, Young pleaded guilty to two more counts of practicing medicine without a license. The plea agreement called for a 44-month sentence, some of which had already been served under house arrest [16]. It also contained this statement:
I, Robert O. Young, declare freely and voluntarily, under penalty of perjury that
I do not have any post high-school educational degrees from any accredited schools.
I am not a Microbiologist.
I am not a Hematologist.
I am not a Medical Doctor.
I am not a Naturopathic Doctor.
I am not a trained scientist [17].
In June 2017, the judge issued the sentence and expressed hope that Young would not repeat what he did in the future [18].
I have so much evidence - I exposed a lot on my page https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100068922816380