341 Comments
User's avatar
Heather B's avatar

What do you say to the people who have taken Ivermectin and their stage 4 cancer is completely gone? Honest question. There is a whole stack that is about all the patients' stories of being cured of cancer and other horrible diseases after taking it and sometimes along with fenbendazole...This is all very confusing to those of us trying to navigate the current landscape.

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

I would say that sometimes various pharmaceuticals appear to help heal, but they all are simultaneously damaging organs and systems. Why use gasoline to put out a fire? It will just cause a fire to pop up in another place.

Expand full comment
Kevin Love's avatar

This is such bogus info. Counterintuitive to findings. Fenbendazole and ivermectin are doing wonders and the testimonials are proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that this works. What did you have in mind for a solution?

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Read the damn article! There are multiple suggestions for solutions at the end. Most of the testimonials are coming from the CIA bot army, the so-called "Freedom" Big Pharma 2.0 doctors, and the Deep State alternative media.

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

It’s shocking to me that, even those claiming to be aware of the faked pandemic & toxic jabs often uncritically swallow whole the propaganda around various other compounds.

Surely the only stance an awakened person can take is to withhold any trust at all in other products of the industry which poisoned billions?

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Are you saying Mike we should ignore people's choice #1 drug in testimonials ( at least top 10 but math so far #1-#4, still researching

Read 530 positive TESTIMONIALS ie about a 88 % approval rating seems still checking,#1 for extreme turnarounds with fenbendazol #2 there.

Really curious what your favorite anti cancer drug is Mike or just top 5 in general..you should know!?

Theory then becomes testimonials targeted for faking THEORY true!? They seem long ,emotional too me with last names verifiable many and videos too like no other drug did so well..then becomes they are all hyonotized too make up tumors etc but what if verifiable hospital records so many!?

Quite a theory you and Sarah have in the hypnotised ivermectin zombie people falsifying TESTIMONIALS at record levels,wow!! Are you guys advising we stand back far enough so they can't chomp our jugulars when we interview them for legitimacy? I think I'll bring a few raw steaks just in case SARAH theory is right and wrap them around my neck,ya never know,I've been wrong before!

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Trust or no trust pharma has us or are family members and friends poisoned but more by some drugs then others..we need to rate these drugs on toxicity charts based on not just studies as their corrupted but by actual injury death rates where used in controlled settings non study like hospitals and TESTIMONIALS sites , .attacking one drug of the flu ,covid protocol is ridiculous,we have to know which can assist likely and which can't and which are fast killers.as dodging all about impossible for our elderly trapped in system....no evidence ivermectin is a fast regular killer but tremendous evidence remdesivir is...not going there shows potential unhealthy in general agenda Mike..will you speak against paxlovid and remdesivir as being faster regular killers then ivermectin so we can believe in you here? Those are the 2 drugs are elderly are being pressured by Drs to take at hospitals after PCR positive by the hundreds daily,not ivermectin,less relevant in scheme of things.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

In truth Sarah you offer no solutions for stage 4 cancer that compares to fenbendazol offering complete reversals in in few weeks avg,no drug or natural substance ever acted so quickly against cancer with low side effects...your insistence they are all fools for not reading your article and not taking fenbendazol as they will all be suffering horribly and dead sometime in the future is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard a ex nurse professional say..

.Don't you get it ,stage 4 cancer..80% dead in under a year avg,40 percent dead in 6 months,25 % dead in 4 months when cancers are averaged stage 4 approx ..they are sentenced largely to death with near nothing to lose ...your remedies offering a sad fraction of fenbendazols short,midterm and long-term results...no dramatic die offs being seen at 2-5: year recovery checks with fenbendazol you suggest very very loosely is the norm

Until you can demonstrate otherwise, to advocate stage 4 patients not take fenbendazol is a form of unlicensed malpractice legally if you were pushing your natural protocol in liu and that 2nd degree charge and conviction in comparable other cases has occurred many times across the world when better proven treatments were sabatouged in favor of weaker offers with lesser track records.

Morally,trying to push masses of people from most successful cancer drug in all history ,fenbendazol ,based on theory after it halts cancer theyll get some other disease assuredly by taking it in 1 to 10+ years when they were at deaths door practically is such a FAILURE OF BASIC RATIONAL GOODNESS as to discredit the rest of your efforts in other topics,as potentially just suspect filler as you are obviously compromised at key junctures by something very unhealthy in and for body ,mind and spirit.. certainly not respecting the spirit of truth or common sense intelligence of your readership,OH BROTHER PLEASE REALLY!? ,"DONT TAKE ABOUT TO DIE STAGE 4 DRUG CUZ AFTER CURED YOULL MAYBE HAVE A SIDE EFFECT ONE DAY"= SERIOUS DEFINITION OF SILLY LEVEL MEDICAL MALPRACTICE!- AND CHARGEABLE POTENTIALLY SARAH- LET OUR SUBSTACK STAGE 4 FRIENDS LIVE LONGER WITH FENBENDAZOL.Unlike Ivermectin youve not provided any specific to drug evidence against fenbendazol curing claims or 1 to 5 year survival rate,until you do STOP hurting people and truth here!

STOP YOUR MALPRACTICE,NO EVIDENCE PROVIDED ATTACK ON FENBENDAZOL..YOUR GOING TO KILL SOMEBODY(S).,

SEARCH FACEBOOK FENBENDAZOL GROUP

AND PUBMED.COM...ENTER FENBENDAZOL...SCROLL DOWN TO TESTIMONIALS...SEE AMAZING LIKES!

Sarah,only way your in right here is if fenbendazol like ivermectin is a zombie mind control and your in bad position of not being able to front that evidence as with ivermectin...unlike most rest..I accept danger of brain effects real with ivermectin,unless you can show same with fenbendazol then back off...

I backed off your ivermectin attack as you raised legit doubts..not with fenbendazol...if you persist there too were back on...trying to be friendly with you cuz of your good stuff pushes but you get no free pass on fenbendazol...make a case or leave our dying substackers alone with fenbendazol will just kill you nonsense!

If it's also a mind control drug then say it! I'll consider,you know I believe in that stuff,but I'll need some evidence.

Broader issue is most all human anti parasitic drugs since Rockefeller have been attacked or made INTENTIONALLY over toxic as parasites are pharmas best friend causing widespread largely undetectable to cause disease ( unprovable at least easily).

Hence hundreds of shills hired to attack parasite threat theory and working drugs since 1911. Cancer is caused largely by parasites and fungus period= we have a problem here Houston with antiparasitics Truth... Coincidentally your taking an extreme position here while riding a myriad of correct TRUTHER positions other issues,issues that have plenty of common backing...Those fighting for working anti parasitics= not so many...in short:

YOU ARE SUSPECT ON YOUR POSITION AGAINST BEST ANTIPARASITIC CANCER DRUG EVER, FENBENDAZOL...

MAKE A CLEAR,EVIDENCE BACKED CASE AGAINST IT SPECIFICALLY UNRELIANT ON PAST DRUG FAILURES OR LEAVE STAGE 4 DYING PEOPLE ALONE TO TAKE FENBENDAZOL WITHOUT YOUR CRIES!

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

I have written 4 articles regarding how to treat cancer holistically and explaining the root causes of the turbo cancers. Yes, it's more complicated than "take Fenbendazole." IMO, it's malpractice to promote anything Pharma. You worry about your medical license and I'll worry about mine.

Expand full comment
Elroy's avatar

Well, I’m no CIA bot and I can attest that my father in law took fenbendazole (the Joe Tippens protocol) for his invasive bone cancer, and less than a year later he has been deemed (by his oncologist) to be “cancer free”. No side effects, either (and it was taken alongside traditional cancer treatment). So, say what you wish, I’m just grateful my FIL is still with us and feeling back to his old self.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

You don't need to be licensed to be charged or sued for advising badly medically to public or individuals, especially if evidence resulted in harm.

I agree it's more complex then fenbendazol to maintain good health,but to stop tumour growth for about half it's not initially anyway and it's toxicitys are weather able

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Tons of people less into drugs and cancer then you offering to explain in detail cancer remedies in replys,no attempt to concise them here as well hardly shows a passion to heal only to redirect..ie you and I both know most people will not search for your articles and those that do most will skim only, potentially missing key remedy paragraphs,leaving about 1-3 percent of blog readers to find remedy offered in articles...No,no Sarah your too smart not to know that math.. state your cures here and stop doing rude " damn it , read my book thing" every day, hardly becoming!

Root causes of 80 percent plus of cancers are parasites and eggs...Failures of other treatments to do with not reaching eggs hiding outside of bloodstream..

Ivermectin and fenbendazol solved that..

Cancers don't return cuz eggs don't return.

This is why half the people cured in under 3:weeks...nothing to followup..they are gone..

If so and side effects less then avg your familiar with then fenbendazol is the exception to rule it appears to be.

Let's see your negative studies on fenbendazol or stop attack on it based on averages of drugs alone argument.Its not an avg drug off the bat or at mid check ie 2-5 year health..for stage 4 that's quite enough!

You don't have a good cancer protocol to summarize do you! That's why you'll never put it here in replys cuz all would see fast!

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Read the article nothing close to solutions for stage 3 or 4 comparative or even stage 2,1 stage maybe but you know most won't change lifestyle so your scaring them from #1 cure potential cuz if unproven to this particular drug organ shift w umbrella argument= ridiculously weak arguments to fully non applicable...why ,who's funding ..what's your top 3-5 list then if other worst drugs if you really care so much..must be ton of people there to influence change Ms.saw health records and drugs used of hundreds patience for decades ex nurse so know s thing or 2 about worse drugs...

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

yup kevin pay the account no mind, it's obviously some kind of controlled writeup by pharma shills.

Expand full comment
Kevin Love's avatar

May be a schill. Seems sketchy

Expand full comment
Hazel's avatar

This lady is clueless

Expand full comment
Kevin Love's avatar

My apologies but I am quick to discount those who discount IVER and Fenbendazole treatments in a positive manner as my holistic Dr has been seeing positive results time after time.

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Even great doctors can be wrong sometimes. We are all human.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Maybe he's a ivermectin zombie programmed to say that!

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Duh,cuz at stage 4 or your dead at 90 +% without #1 most effective drugs silly...did they brain control you to be dumb here? It worked!!

Expand full comment
Dr.Don Hall's avatar

These are accurate description(s) Iver mechanisms and inaccurate outcomes based on stacks of positive Iver users snd various applications for multiple medical improving the nutrition, general health and wellbeing of billions of people worldwide ever since it was first used to treat Onchocerciasis in humans in 1988

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Just keep believing the propaganda, my friend.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Insisting that low to moderate short term doses of drugs will majority or always basically fail cuz of poisoning other body parts is a silly unproven premise. Of course that happens sometimes in minority unless long term use,who cares if your life was just saved by drugs in 1 to few days dose ie breathing drugs like ivermectin for example when option often is getting extreme poison drug remdesivir or getting vented,lung damaged/killed

Silly blanket statements have no place in science or medicine or even organic herbs which also kill occasionally..

Pharma corps have control of most of our packaged food as well...shall we tell the poor not to eat cuz there's corruption in the world? No,you compare and contrast least toxic to most until we're safely in heaven...very irresponsible to want to deprive people of most effective,least toxic meds when you know damn well their unavoidable for 90 plus percent of us...as if we lived in a free unoppressive society,where our elderly have a real choice..

Expand full comment
Fins McGee's avatar

You mean silly blanket statements like yours?

Expand full comment
Johnathan's avatar

Lol we see you glowie

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

It's an extremely deceptive writeup. Substack is infiltrating the truther community with anti-supplement propaganda. Those supplements listed, especially, along with Ivermectin, are all very safe, and quite useful.

Expand full comment
Heather B's avatar

I've seen miracles with ivermectin in dogs for ages and have a friend who cured a horrible cancer with it....

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

Same.

Expand full comment
Steveo's avatar

Hmmm, Rothschild...Where have I seen that name before?🤔

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

I'm not a Rothschild, it's a very obvious joke you tard-muffin.

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

Tard muffin. I like that term.

Expand full comment
Dr.Don Hall's avatar

I will take Billions of success stories against one or three well (too slick timing actually) presented sprinkled with apparent speculative and journalist inspired articles

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

That's very smart. Sarah didn't even write this crap, it's a glowie account now, controlled opposition. Sarah had a completely different personality and writing style, didn't gaslight anyone either. Like Agent and Medicine Girl, also anti-supplement, anti-ivermectin glowie accounts. Ivermectin is literally 100% safe. It was legitimately--and remains--difficult to get during COVID. And cancer patients have to get it from TN, overseas, etc. Obviously, it works. Pharma is trying to see what us truthers will fall for.

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Bro, I write absolutely every word of every article in my Substack publication. If you think it's crap, don't read it. If you support Pharma, you will not like anything that I write about health because EVERYTHING made by Pharma is intended for harm and you will never hear me rah-rahing toxic Medical Industrial Complex drugs.

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

I don't support pharma; you do.

Expand full comment
Fins McGee's avatar

No, you do.

Expand full comment
Fins McGee's avatar

No, you do.

Expand full comment
Fins McGee's avatar

Do you have covaids fantasies frequently? Time to get your pill.

Expand full comment
Katherine's avatar

Dr. William Makis, a Canadian former oncologist, writes verrrrry frequently on Substack about his cancer patients' great successes with Ivermectin. I believe him to have integrity and great knowledge. But I also believe Sarah embodies the same qualities.

I'm just so incredibly confused about Ivermectin!

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Hi Katherine. Makis may have been fooled by the psyop or, he may be controlled opposition. I was convinced for 1-2 years that Peter McCullough was sincere and working to help humanity, but he isn't sincere and he isn't working to help humanity IMO. He is working to sell the idea of Big Pharma 2.0 since many no longer trust Pharma 1.0. I don't really follow Makis' work enough to have an opinion of whether or not he is sincere. That said, I struggle to understand how any of these doctors have missed making the connection that Big Pharma and allopathic medicine was founded for the purposes of eugenics and depopulation. I was just as indoctrinated by my education and nursing practice as these docs have been. But, when I began to see the ridiculous amount of fraud in the allopathic journals, I began to question how many more drugs were being praised in these journals but were created for harm. That led me on a 5 year journey that has resulted in the conclusion that ALL pharmaceuticals are intended for harm. It is a business model. Sell products under the guise of treating illness that cause more illness. By doing so, they ensure more and more people have more and more health problems, and therefore spend more money on allopathic care and pharmaceuticals. It's the Problem-Reaction-Solution psyop. At best, Makis is ignorant regarding this history and has been fooled by the Ivermectin psyop. He is further still being fooled regarding the fact that all pharmaceuticals enable the continuance of the Big Pharma business model. Thank you for reading my articles and for the kind words in your comment.

Expand full comment
Luzzie's avatar

Yes! A business model, indeed. It's shocking to see dozens of pill bottles lined up on countertops. Starts with one drug, then another drug or two to fix the side effects caused by drug #1, and another set of drugs to fix those side effects, then another set to fix the side effects of the second set, and on and on it goes!

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

I'm ok w all or nearly all drugs more harm then good but what of parasite issue? Doesn't seem black walnut n like can cross barriers to kill sacs of parasites,eggs,waste,,puss,that firm cystst and rumours we call cancer..w a minority of exceptions non parasite toxin Lunps- but those draw parasites still cuz of low ,dead tissue frequency...

Answer may be: if your dying ie stage 3-4 ,ivermectin , fenbendazol dice roll makes sense w certain precautions that Sarah is going to announce in a list #1 being dodge DMSO...

Otherwise way too Russian roulette and brain control risk thing so here's my top 5 list of options.. short n sweet...

Hulda Clarks parasites zapoers and related any good?

So important to offer short rememberal protocols to extent possible...then seperately long form back up for interested in depths of it ..

Expand full comment
Fins McGee's avatar

Is “doesn’t seem” following your science?

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

VETERINARY ANTIPARASITICS LESS TOXIC & EFFECTIVE THEN HUMAN ANTIPARASITICS! CURES 1/3 OF DISEASES IS SECRET!!

Majority to virtually all of commercial packaged l foods and drinks compared to organic ,natural pure foods also cause harm comparatively yet cuz 95% don't access or grow their own organics etc their left with largely choice to eat or not to eat and more precisely to select least toxics among the packaged ,usually processed foods,a selection process you discourage with blanket statement drugs( and cheap but affordable comparatively processed foods)are equally toxic,a flat out lie!

Also it's similar to saying all natural toxins are toxic therefore don't eat any food with them... ridiculous!

Motivation quite possibly is to steer people from most effective relevant drugs today which are the ANTIPARASITICS as we are being overrun by infestations that occur with bad health increases in general as as parasite defenses fail but also do to hidden secrets that lipids used in mRNA tech are partly composed of parasitic derived lab grown proteins that are being destroyed by ivermectin, fenbendazol,other antiparasitics..

Notice many of these anti- antiparasitic drug crusaders are also either not pushing best natural anti parasitics or are even exaggerating probiotics theory to say most to all parasites beneficial and people claiming disease and death by parasites by thousands,millions are mixed up somehow...a obviously ridiculous notion with massive worms and heart and brain worms infestations included etc.. ;

but because so little anti parasitic regular encouragemen in mainstream (never served pharmas interest to alert ie hidden parasites their best friends right; only allowed for livestock,elites racehorses and eventually are pets accessed as humans left with only prescription super toxic antiparasitic chemo level alternatives that don't work safely at all for deworming= conspiracy of drug non comparison of relevant toxicity and effectiveness with veterinarian vs human ANTIPARASITICS that Sarah+ and pharma encourages most intensly...whatever good Sarah is doing not enuff for failure here and aligning with pharmas ultimate interests in subject area online @ substack.

She and we should be aligning to discover least toxic ANTIPARASITICS in both pharma drugs and herbal/alternative form taking note of droves of people being cursed of cancer and respiratory diseases and more in record time with VETERINARIAN ANTIPARASITICS of dramatically less toxicity then avg human antiparasitics drug..this phenomenon could only happen with intent ie elites steer their decadent racehorses and poodles and livestock investment and children to ivermectin, fenbendazol,etc vet drugs and 95% of populace away from them with propaganda making sure even in naturalist arenas online with those like Sarah spouting all drugs equally evil stupor(tell that to someone bit by a rattlesnake vs a cobra..same toxicitys garbage!)- but pharma wouldnt put someone online spouting 96 % traditional hippy natural just to demonize effective hidden vet antiparasitics would they? They would if PARASITES were responsible for over a third of serious disease and early death and that knowledge spread to cut dramatically into their profits and culling motives as their run by secret society cults we tried to escape around 1776...my advise is keep on trying to escape..they just made the chains a tad invisible until they really want to pull you in at certain junctures..like illness/ death pushes for example ie 2020-25 PCR/ VAXX/ETC TARGETED INCREASE IN TOXINS AND OPPRESSIONS!!

THAT SAID WE NEED TO FOCUS ON BEST NATURAL ANTIPARASITICS PROTOCULS( COMPILING SOON) PERHAPS IN CONJUNCTION WITH DMSO OR LIKE TO REACH BONES WHERE PARASITES RETREAT (WHY IVERMECTIN WORKS THERE..) AS WELL AS LOBBYING FOR MINIMUM EFFECTIVE DOSE IVERMECTIN AS PHARMA INTENTIONALLY PRESSURING OVERDOSE'S TO AGAIN PUSH IVERMECTIN, FENBENDAZOL BAD AGENDA,ETC...OK WHO AGREES AND DOESN'T? DID I NOT GO DEEPEST POIGNANTLY ON ISSUE?

FINALLY FENBENDAZOL HAS LESS HALF THE SIDE EFFECTS IF IVERMECTIN SO DONT TAKE IVERMECTIN UNLESS FENBENDAZOL FAILS AND TAKE IT AS DEWORMER SPECIALISTS ADVISE,TIMED TO WEEKS OUT EGG HATCHINGS...MOST DRS FAIL TO ADVISE HERE.

SEVONDLY TAKE PREFERABLY AT 1/3 RECOMMENDED DOSE INITIALLY BUILDING TO 2/3 MAX TO AVOID SIDE EFFECTS AND HERKSHIMER PARSITE DIE OFF EFFECT WHERE TOO MUCH DEAD WORMS AND FECES IN BLOOD AT ONE TIME.

PHARMA DISCOUNTS THIS DIE OFF POISONING EFFECT SD THEY CLAIM WERE NOT INFESTED, REMEMBER?

IF CANT BREATHE WELL ETC RISK HIGHER DOSE AS LIKELY LESS DANGEROUS THEN OTHER FACTORS..I FEAR THEM ALTERING TOXICITYS OF THESE 2 VET DRUGS SD GETTING TOO POPULAR... EVERYTHING RISKIER THESE DAYS..I ONLY ADVISE MY CHOICES,CANT GAURANTEE ANYTHING,DISCERN EVERY MOMENT AND NEW FACTORS WITH YOUR BEST AND GOD!

EASIEST GO TO NATURAL ARE: BAKING SODA EVERY 6 HOURS IF ACUTE AT 1/2 TSPN TO 8 OZ WATER

HYDROGEN PEROXIDE DILUTED GARGLE EVERY 6 HOURS IF ACUTE..GO ONLINE TO SEE MEASUREMENTS ALTS

EUCALYPTUS OIL OR OREGONO OIL

NETI POT OR EQUIVALENT EVERY FEW

HOURS

OREGONO OIL 2 PILL EVERY 8 HOURS IF ACUTE OR GO ONLINE FOR DOSE ALTS...NEVER TAKE UNDILUTED...SERIOUS BURNS..

Oxygen machines ie non ventilator: you don't need to blast your lungs out to get adequate additional oxygen but damage can still occur do to factors like dryness of air,etc so humidifiers,steamers here assist..can be found for less then $300 and neighbors can share expense and have on hand to dodge hospitals..

I'll be creating a longer protocol list soon for both respiratory and cancer +

Meantime go to Earthclinic.com...sesrch A to Z disease cures or for example: flu top 10 or cancer top 10 ...thing they offer..

Trust no one but God/Christ and best of your heart on DISCERNED on a good virtuous day!

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Who cares if you have a thousand poisonus snakes and one only will cure stage 4 cancer if you survive it's bite .Since most are you take the chance ie fenbendazol..

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

In a purist utopian, heaven should be our goal sense I agree Sarah,kill pharma entirely and rebuild...but until even close to that ability vastly more important to outline in the here and now and next decade which drugs our worst,best,not to mix (cuz they don't tell long list),which to microdose under specs and why ie your ivermectin dose dependent to crossing brain barrier section you need to paraphrase EVERWHERE...dodge generalities kess gripping.. ETC..tighten it up to insect,is brain comparison, barrier cross, dose related and you'll shock the ivermectin lovers..dodge the lesser issues and politics they're versed to argue in .

Problem with your 100 percent attack on ivermectin is you admit problem of parasites and cancer connection.. you admit seemingly it's curing ,remissioning a previously unseen percent of stage 3-4 cancers,you admit nothing is stopping the cancers faster for this percentage in the alternative..but you won't advocate for it's use even likely due to 2 factors 1)nano brain control thing and a low percent of serious observed side effects and 2) that supports a evil pharma monopoly in general.

People don't care about politics when dying...even knowing evils and risks I've agreed w you on I'd take ivermectin at lower doses to save my life in probability of it being my best chance but only after trying fenbendazol with less side effects they say.

Until you and your troops take over the pharma, govts will you steer some people to most successful top 1% of drugs in existence ie fenbendazol likely rating 1 to 10 of all time?

Does fenben have same brain barrier issues .if not would you kindly point to that cuz if you can't allow any seperations of drugs by performance due to corruption in the world corporations ie pharma you need to put that forward off the topro be honest here with your debating drugs and related issues audience I'd argue.

We aren't in utopia heaven yet,we have to utilize shades of gray at our disposal some brighter then others,if we only reach for pure white we will have a emptier hand and our own kind of fantasy world,not helping at that extreme Sarah,we need to sort out the specific delusions in the here and now and pick from the best,Utopia is a fantasy when that be demons around,only heaven is divided from them, political, economical movements won't cleanse pharma or any group or body,only get it to a lighter grey's, colors if you will..

You might consider studying the drug and herb TESTIMONIAL sites like pubmed- search testimonials ivermectin and say top 30 drugs and their complexities.

DMSO and best herbal antiparasitic and zapper type techs may cure cancer, ETC.

Nano tech still studying:Anas EDTA and vitamin C scrambled weak protocols are obviously not a full passionate attempt to help us...many more elements needed..

Methyleneblue is producing about 3O % medium severe side effects on boards Ana ignoring..plus it dyes your cells blue which is having morphic altering effects according to some critics and assisting nano to that end I suspect..for one so pure against pharma why the exception here Sarah,side effects more common then ivermectin on the TESTIMONIALS!

So yea,Im excited about your take on alot but invariably I find little to big issues w everyone...and myself even...I'm like the humblest person ever!ha!

Your push on the ivermectin brain barrier dose related overdosing issue is gold...you should repeat those dose maximums safe everywhere and deal with first the problems at hand this month,year in those effected,Maybe wait till say 2027 at least to shut down pharma entirely ok SARAH it's still gonna be a quite a chore on that schedule for ya! Ok again love your stuff and direction in general,but details count,people need specifics today, fenbendazol # 1 curing quick cancer death drug and possibly many diseases...like to see your list of top 10 drugs and top 10 natural cures..peoples attention span is about a 1/8 of what it was a decade ago!

Expand full comment
Fins McGee's avatar

Is uour own kind of fantasy world an obsession with lists?

Expand full comment
Kevin Love's avatar

Don’t be. It’s all fear tactics. It works and my holistic doctor is getting amazing results from his patients. See Dr Phan on Substack as he will tell you firsthand what a miracle this is.

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

100

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Good morning, Heather. I came across this article yesterday that shows how Ivermectin may temporarily kill off cancer, but damages DNA and organs profoundly, basically insuring the cancer comes back with a vengeance later, and the body's self-healing mechanisms will be far less capable of fighting it. https://timtruth.substack.com/p/ivermectin-is-cytotoxic-and-genotoxic?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment
chlorella's avatar

Our backyard poultry are still not laying after months now since my stepdaughter "overmected" them for leg mites..... I stated just one drop each! I have no idea how much they might've received...

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

We have to CONSIDER a massive wave of controlled people posting lies about ivermectin ie thousands being safe and effective for them...I'd have said impossible 4 years ago but I can't be certain .For example I remember reading bits and pieces of ivermectin eating insects minds away and danger there for us a bit and somehow forgot it till now! Weird!

Seems if ivermectin works by blocking and adding key chemical in brain till insect is dead or damaged and does so by crossing protective brain barriers and can admittedly cross ours too in medium to high dose commonly given there's a plot afoot to damage our brains and possibly to allow nanotech easier access to brain synapses ie control...

Seems there's a concerted effort to keep 99% if us from know brain barrier issue...which is also dangerous as there's many drugs, foods,drinks that physilitate barrier compromise,most famously DMSO,very popular with the holistic ivermectin combo gang...wouldn't you be facing potential great brain damage or worse if you take at same time as ivermectin?WHERE ARE THE WARNINGS TO DODGE DMSO,ETC ON IVERMECTIN? ANSWER IS:NO WARNINGS- COLLATERAL DAMAGE OK TO THEM WITH DMSO USERS,ETC,ITS ALL ABOUT THE MASS AGENDA=NANOTECH EASY ACCESS TO BRAIN SYNAPSES TAKEOVER THRU BLOOD BRAIN BARRIERS!? MAYBE!ONLY LOGICAL EXPLA. I CAN FIND...

SARAH,IS THIS YOUR THEORY CONCLUSION OR ARE DID YOU FIND THIS ELSEWHERE!?IF SO WHO?

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

it isn't sarah anymore greg, the account must have been taken over by pharma's glowies.

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

You're being ridiculous. If anyone on Substack disagrees with the Big Pharma 2.0 Freedom doctors, they must also be Big Pharma agents? How does that even make sense to you? It's funny that you (a self-labeled Rothschild) and Greg, who has been hounding me relentlessly with a barrage of rambling comments for days now are joining forces to talk crap together. You two are the ones supporting Pharma as you both rave on about the supposed healing sanctity of avermectin pesticides and accuse me of being a Pharma agent.

Egos gentleman. It's easier to believe that I'm somehow the enemy than to consider that you've been fooled by the Big Pharma 2.0 Freedom docs.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Hmmmm,what specific differences in style tipped you off?

Expand full comment
Fins McGee's avatar

The lists of doom.

Expand full comment
Fins McGee's avatar

Takes one to know one.

Expand full comment
Brian Costello's avatar

Chlorine Dioxide. Is The Best Cure. As NASA Stated. It’s the Universal Antidote. DAW

Expand full comment
Dr.Don Hall's avatar

Say this, Pharm has Long Arms. Misinfo. disInfo. And Damn Lies!

Expand full comment
Pat Fuller's avatar

So weird it was used safely for about 70 years.

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Has it? That's interesting, because it has long been used as a sterilization drug in 3rd World countries. It has also always caused acute kidney injury, liver damage, and neurological injury. It also has always been known to damage the immune system by suppressing NK and T-helper white blood cells. Of course, the pharmaceutical industry has published 50 years or so of absolute bullshit propaganda similar to what they have published regarding the miracle of vaccines, stating how "safe and effective" their depopulation drug is. I guess if that is what you are reading, then yes, we have been TOLD that it has been used safely for a long time now.

Expand full comment
Dale Bahten's avatar

I’m with you on the jab but why would farmers and ranchers give ivermectin to their breeding stock throughout the life of the animal if it caused sterilization?

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Likely, because they don't realize it has those side effects.

Expand full comment
Dakota Grace's avatar

If the animals are still breeding, it doesn’t have those side effects.

Expand full comment
The BarefootHealer's avatar

Because the cows and horses fertility window differ and most would be past "breeding" window for viable profit. We live longer and have a different fertility window. The farmers would be culling or putting their stud animals out to pasture, before the effects are likely noticeable. Besides, its not just about fertility, its about docility, pliability.😉

I dont recommend it to anyone who DOESNT have stage 4 cancer diagnosis. For obvious reasons. But primarily because it messes with the microtubules in the cells and that stops your ability to create your own internal light within your mitochondria and cell signalling. Means you are more suceptible to disease states in general and it shortens your life span. But nobody likes mentioning the D(epopulation) word.😑🙄 Not when its such a good seller again, despite being off patent.

#follownone #mistakeswereNOTmade #getlocalised

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Dale,you've made a very relevant comment..I feel present day ivermectin not matching brain barrier bashing descriptions ie may have switched to frequency drug and inert material.. anyway can you cite a few animal studies and doses and length of time on drug,years studied...the extreme of ivermectin are on the net but so are the contradictions mellowness prevalence...they're messing with Sarah ,so I'm trying to rescue her and figure this mystery out before she melts down and they have to scoop her up with SPECIAL white coats!

Expand full comment
Dale Bahten's avatar

I’m sure those studies are out there for any one interested enough to look them up. In my opinion the lions share of ivermectin is used by farmers and ranchers whose primary interest is breeding stock. If it caused any problems they would use something else.

Expand full comment
Pat Fuller's avatar

I have challenged it as well. I won’t take any AMA crap, just got out of my unheated pool in Az. About as close as I get to a real cold plunge… I try to be as natural as possible.

Expand full comment
Pat Fuller's avatar

Thank you for posting!

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Thinking about how we acknowledge elites pharma lie about things yet suddenly Sarah we trust them on things like RNA and DNA and say how ivermectin kills w chemical alterations crossing brain barrier,well what if they lied there a bit too?.

Rumours have it many drugs no longer contain original chemical elements and have been switched to the bio resonances and frequencies that matched the original material.I fact online they sell such patches and even downloavle programs with meds frequencues and allegedly they work to 50 percent of dense physical product their imitating at frequency level.

One if the Advantages bragged was reduction of side effects . Conspiracy goes change was made largely about a dozen years back and over third drugs are inert material w crystals grinded in mix to hold frequency better.

Don't know if all above us true but some is and TESTIMONIALS exist including athletes ETC

I cover this cuz ivermectins lack of serious brain damage and deaths that occurred earlier or by theory are happening seemingly in under 1 to 5 percent max if recipients many using massive daily doses . They should be veggies or dead by a large portion,just not happening unless theirs a larger conspiracy to have many falsifify testimonials,a hundred or so on your stack alone Sarah!

No evidence is strong were not dealing w the drug ivermectin as it's described.

Deep dive on frequency drugs needs doing.

The evidence that bacteria can transfer thru closed crystal not glass is relevant here as well..I'll get back to you on that study..lotta woo woo on it but matches ancient crystal lore and witch wand lore...yikes! Be good!

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

If so it would show up in pubmed.com testimonials..where every drug is reviews by hundreds of patients...it's not showing Sarah...You worked nurse administration for years and many people in that position end up working for PHARMA...you have the opportunity in that position to hear of what drugs are better then others... Ivermectin has panacea like qualities helping many diseases and is gentler then most chemo drugs that fail to cure...when people have a year to live they don't care about rare side effects..you refuse to cite large cross reference study's for a reason cuz they prove radical side effects are rare w ivermectin You never cite how common they are,just that it happens....Without prevalence % clarified you have zero point

Expand full comment
Dale Bahten's avatar

But wouldn’t they see those effects, their business is literally built on those animals getting pregnant.

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Obviously, they don't. It doesn't cause 100% infertility. It causes somewhere between 30-60% infertility when taken consistently with humwns and in mouse and rat studies. Idk much about how farmers and ranchers treat their animals with these drugs. If they are treating them daily, I would expect that they would definitely note a decrease in pregnancies. However, if it's used as parasite maintenance and possibly given once a month or every couple of months, the effects may not be quite as dramatic as the 30-60% infertility rate aforementioned.

Expand full comment
Dale Bahten's avatar

In Africa they call it their Sunday pill or something. Indicating one dose a week.. I’ve never heard of any one taking it 365 days a year. Even with high dosage for cancer treatment they take a week or more off here and there.

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Interesting regarding Africa. It's not supposed to be taken more than once every 3-12 months according to the sources I read.

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

I’m as sensitive as a petal and felt fine taking it for a short course. Garlic can harm the brain and poison you, it depends on dose and weighing up options.

Water can kill you. I used quite a strong toxin and managed to regrow my injured tooth as a result… that was a win overall i think.

Extreme fitness/exercise can damage the brain and fertility too .. as can veganism . Medicine used to be about weighing up the various options, now we seem to be back to thinking in black and white :(

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Look, if you want to take avermectin pesticide and call it "medicine," be my guest. I don't understand people getting indignant over an article that is well-sourced and shares true information regarding a Rockefeller drug. I even specifically talked about dosing and gave examples of the fact that Pharma 2.0 organizations like the FLCCC are advising people to take doses that are 2-3x what the manufacturer says is "safe and effective." Furthermore, it's a single dose drug that isn't supposed to be repeated more than once every 3 months, but people are being advised to take it daily for several days, weeks, or months. Did you even read the article? There was a few paragraphs specifically regarding dosage.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

When ones health goes south parasites get out of control,our body amps go down and we're closer to dead flesh they are designed to compost .

Additionally they're using parasites to build lipids and other structure,protein components that bind to graphene and plastics. So doses of ivermectin that previously did more damage then good are not anymore..but I agree w you it' too toxic a dose..please consider dirtying your hands and actually recommending specific low and high maximums for avg body weight ie 175 before washing your hands of affair to help the people this month and year who are to be over poisoned and brain damaged..if not you then who? Nobody! Do this and I'll spread it everywhere...Ivermectin is simple death poison won't FLY,lower dosing can fly and help thousands if put tightly and advertised right . fenbendazol same..again check out pubmed reviews...all 6 top cancer drugs are antiparasitics

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Hi Greg. The article shares the recommended dosages for Ivermectin.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Sarah,you did best on this reply against ivermectin lover saying dose thing..but name that dose and avg mistaken dose in one sentence everytime so people remember and question it longer,harder,, Rockefeller and Garden of Eden not helping here...I agree their evil but it's pick your poison drug and poison water,foodtime..some don't hurt or kill much at right dose...others it's bad fast...that's where we're at in the here and now

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

Alternative health folk are telling people to take massive doses of bitter almonds too .. and black pepper is a well researched carcinogen. Things are not simple.

Evil farmers selling almonds and pepper ? it is just more complicated.. ive lived on an AI healthy diet and lifestyle and got sick .. friends who took fenbendazole and antibiotics were healthier than me .. so it clearly isnt straightforward. I know heaps of natural health people who are sick , and people who've taken IVT all their lives who are fit and well, with fit and healthy children . it's complex.

Expand full comment
ShortLeggedDog's avatar

Your observations are just that. Without any medical training and scientific basis referenced or complete health records & even labs you can’t draw any sound conclusions about anyone’s health status. I agree it’s complex but you are trying to reduce the complexity to your simple observations and perception of what a healthy person is. Just stop.

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

Well my partner is a well trained doctor and pharmacist, I studied immunology and herbalism for a while most of my friends are trained in biochemstry, medicine, zoology, veterinary science , ethnobotany etc. It's not like I'm making *wild uninformed guesses. I very rarely use any pharma products but i have had an absolute miracle from one of them so I'm extremely glad I'm not closed minded. So just stop yourself .. Im not sure about ivt .. maybe a little low dose .. Needs more research I guess.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Please tell me and anxious world study on garlic brain damage! I should be a veggie!

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

Thousands of years worth of writing on that subject.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

I see nothing on garlic brain damage ie onions too?can you back by even a study,site or such, anything..

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

there are whole religious groups who avoid the onion family .. Oddly extreme comments in this thread, strange.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

I missed the previous onion ,garlic comment...your not referring to that ancient rumour that cleansing garlic and onions at

Are avoided by elites of certain blood makeup ( vampiric or werewolf's or shapeshifting dragonesque tendencies?)..if so makes sense parasites are spiritually related to snakes with into blood fangs etc and low vibe sucking energy/amps out.Onions, garlic nearly unbeatable In worm cleansing you see..Am I way off or?

Expand full comment
Dale Bahten's avatar

Certainly not daily, maybe 3 times a year and alternating with fenbendazole or some other to prevent resistance and get different parasites.

Expand full comment
Cricket's avatar

The fear porn has gotten out of control. I was questioning your intentions with these posts but then I really knew what was up when the list was given. I see exactly whats going on here. Folks, don't listen to everyone just bc they're on SubStack and sound like they know what they're talking about. They're leading you astray. Wolves in sheep's clothing are EVERYWHERE. Discernment is your best friend.

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

Hogwash. Pharma is infiltrating the truther movement by creating their own anti-supplement truther b.s. Ivermectin kills cancer in some cases, and those supplements listed are great and completely safe for anyone who knows what they're doing and has taken supplements before.

Expand full comment
Cricket's avatar

🎯💯👏 The only other one who sees exactly whats going on here.

Expand full comment
Charlie's avatar

Very interesting as I threw it out about a year ago. It dawned on me that all this “consumption” was fear based! Once dispelled a normal mind will ask the question: do I need this?

We are on our own! Mistakes were made.

Did nature produce it? I went back to food and essential oils with an occasional mms drink to remove parasites. Only as needed once confirmed beyond a doubt. Lots of snake oilers salivating at your fear.

It is a minefield. Walk very slow if at all.

Find love and ignore the fear mongers..

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

most essential oils are carcinogenic too .. its just about dose and need. if youre only taking ivermectin out of ‘fear’ you probably dont need it. Others take it to cure a genuine problem.

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

I'm sure Merck and the rest of Big pHarma appreciate your staunch support. Go eugenics!

Expand full comment
Charlie's avatar

I’ll play it safe without or products from nature. Enjoy the Now!

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

It’s not staunch .. and I’ve criticised them all my life .. but i’m a grown up who knows some medical interventions *sometimes help. I’m a bit freaked by the simplistic arguments online these days. Influencers who never actually had to run a hospital or help people. Life is complex.

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

This is not complex, it's simple. Anything made by Pharma is intended for harm. And, I've been an RN for 17 years just FYI. The article is filled with facts and has all of the information well-sourced. Again, if you want to take the drug, go for it! Pharma appreciates your business.

Expand full comment
the LastManStanding's avatar

Have to agree with Yeowoman - if not 'life' in general, certainly THIS issue is complex.

That said, your post is so comprehensive, explanatory, and well presented that I'm rather in awe of your research skills. I've been investigating the matter of BBB-crossing substances being used overtly or surreptitiously for the past couple of weeks.. and the DREADDs thing stayed completely off my radar. Kudos! Ivermectin aside, you've opened a few more doors.

But with regards to that substance... yes I'm confused along with a lot of other folks. There's another doc in Canada who has been a proponent of ivermectin - and is currently being persecuted to an amazing degree - passport cancelled, etc., and I've a lot of respect for his work. How he can be... as you say of Makis...or at least imply, 'controlled opposition' is really a puzzle for me... even as a third degree 'conspiracy theorist!' Maybe getting a little deeper into that conundrum - instead of just blowin folks off with the 'enjoy your Pharma' tag line - would be a fruitful exercise?

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Hi there. I don't listen to Makis and I'm not familiar enough with his work to have an opinion regarding why he is still promoting Big Pharma drugs and is a piece of the Ivermectin psyop. He may be unaware and is simply brainwashed by his education and decades of practicing allopathic medicine. That said, I struggle to understand how anyone in the allopathic medicine world, who realized the C19 shots were deadly and that we were being lied to about everything health-related during the plandemic, could stop at questioning only the mRNA shots. I was also indoctrinated by my education and believed I was doing good work as an allopathic nurse. I became a nurse because I wanted to be able to help people in times of disaster. Medical missions teams were traveling to help people in the Middle East in my church and I wanted to have a skill that could help also. When I saw that all of the health agencies and governments and pharmaceutical companies were lying about everything C19, I began questioning everything, and each time I did a deep dive into a medical topic, I found that we were being lied to about those topics as well. How has Makis never questioned the PCR? The box literally says on it, "not a diagnostic tool." How has he never looked into the founding of allopathic medicine and realized that Rockefeller changed the entire medical model by strong arming schools into teaching his models of disease. The Rockefeller Foundation was founded to further the eugenics movement. If you understand that a eugenicist founded allopathic medicine changed all of the theories of disease, got rid of all natural substances being used for healing, and forced his petroleum-based drugs sales upon all medical students, why would that not make you begin to question the entire system? 100% of Allopathic medicine is based on fraud. The drugs are all marketed with fraud. The trials are all set up and carried out using fraud. The journals are all filled with fraud. Pharmakia means sorcery. You don't have to be religious to understand that pharmaceuticals manipulate the body and rarely heal anything...its magick. In the instances they do actually treat an infection, like antibiotics or Ivermectin, they damage other organs and systems in order to keep the public sick and needing more and more drugs and treatment. It's a business model. So, why doesn't Makis know any if this? I find it very hard to believe that intelligent providers who got a glimpse behind the curtain during C19, decided that the C19 plandemic was the ONLY time this industry has promulgated fraud, abuse, harm, and death.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Not so fast there Sarah,you know very well there's exceptions to that rule in the minority and to blanket statements cuz you hate them and those that run pharma ie your idealogyy: supporting any pharma drug is a soul sellout to evil group making it all thrust is unfair to those who are dying after being hit by a car or will die if they don't have an operation or the smaller percentage of drugs that short term prevent fast worst illness or death like bronchial dilaters when your not breathing and you want to dodge killer ventilators...

But you know all this cuz 1) it's common knowledge 2) cuz you've seen lives saved by such emergency treatments by the dozens if you worked as a nurse.

So why the blanket statement exaggeration that diminishes your own credibility here,do you have an AGENDA or can you correct yourself and regain some credibility.

As my other replys said Im with you on much but exaggeration is a form of lying and shows lack of care for honesty in whatever your quest is. Please fix!

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

What exaggeration? All Pharma-made products are intended for harm. That is a fact. Even normal saline is now filled with the nanotechnology, so there is nothing they make that is benign. Yes, if you get into a car accident, you may need a bone reset, an organ repaired, or a blood transfusion. Those are extreme examples that are incredibly rare. I didn't say that all surgeries are intended for harm. I said all Pharma-made products are intended for harm and that there is always a natural alternative.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Studies please on essential oils causing cancer..most oils are tainted..ones that are not heal

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

They are refined and strong. Of course they can kill you, like anything else. Like i said it depends on dose.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Especially if taken orally...however we absorb more thru skin often ie it's said a 10 min minute shower absorbs you more fluoride then a week of drinking avg amount..

So yes Yeowman, overdoses are happening w essential oils and promotors irresponsible in not stating limits,safe doses 99 percent of time.

That said most testify benefitting and problems rare enuff where system is largely floating well...still VARIANCES in toxicity must be extreme...

Solution: start slow, research dosing from multiple sites,don't use cheap oils,monitor your Self on reactions carefully

We need to calculate which oils most toxic,which brands ,etc and min,max doses cuz it is a drug form period!

Expand full comment
James Martin's avatar

Substack is falling into the abyss of fear-mongering wackos. I’ve seen it all. Chemtrails and 5G designed to kill. Now ivermectin. You want a real health crisis? Consider the ubiquitous presence of micro and nano plastics in just about everything we eat and drink these days.

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Microplastics, shmicroplastics. Sounds like another conspiracy theory! GMOs and glyphosate are totally good for you! Just like stratospheric aerosol injection (chemtrails), nanotechnology, depopulation, global government, CIA drug running, Musk's satellite global surveillance grid, and a Luciferian Cult who controls it all are good for you and here to help make the world a better place! No doubt, all of the straight lines we can see all over the sky that then expand and create a chemical-nanometal blanket of cloud cover, is totally just our eyes playing tricks on all of us. That's totally natural!

We all need to stop believing our lying eyes and trust our benevolent oligarch-owned governments who never lie about anything. And no, SMART doesn't stand for Secret Militarized Armaments in Residential Technologies. Nope, its not an acronym at all. It's just a description of intelligent tech in all caps! And, the COVID-19 depopulation shots were all about saving lives! Hence why there are not tens of millions of excess deaths according to government statistics. That's just our lying eyes playing tricks on us again. We should all remove our eyeballs so we cannot be constantly misled.

Ivermectin is totally awesome. That's why the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Gates', World Bank, and all of their connected NGOs have been funding freebies to the tune of billions for about 40 years. Because these people CARE about the poor and the sick. You are so right! Except about your microplastics. They definitely aren't endocrine disrupting and do not contribute to cancers. Nope, microplastics are vitamins!

Expand full comment
Amber's avatar

Curious if you've ever done your research to find out about the 5G Network? Not like it's any of your business But just as a person who has a lot of interest in this and loss of life Coming from personal experience The 5G Network does kill people with the radiation and the frequency is being used sensible messages into people's brains hijacking their minds and overtaking them for the B system is a very serious issue You can call me crazy you can call me whatever you want but I'm the one that lives my life this way every single day and I have proof for it you don't have s*** behind you with your accusation

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Amber, every word of that comment was said with sarcasm. I'm very aware of the 5G control grid that enables the Internet of Bodies and Internet of Things and how that causes illnesses.

Expand full comment
Mic's avatar

Seems to be fictional nonsense to me but maybe my mind is controlled and I am therefore a zombie.

I’m sticking with my ivermectin.

This article has the slight hint of bullshit in it.

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Is there akot of missing dogs and cats and maybe slow kids in your neighborhood? Suspicious blood stains and strange lack of appetite sometimes= zombie for sure!( I try not to judge). Have you considered zombies anonymous ,I here it's great for finding that special one!

Expand full comment
Greg's's avatar

Ever check your blood for Rouleuxe reduction after ivermectin,claim is 50-80 percent reduction and drastic increase if oxygen...we need over 10 people to verify .wanna help defeat these anti iver freakoids!

Expand full comment
Barbara's avatar

Trying to scare everyone away from it! Odd how in Africa they take it once a week and they are not Zombies, they may die of hunger but not cancer! I don't believe a word of it! Scare Tactic!

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Pah-lease. You couldn't believe it if you wanted to because you didn't read it! Enjoy your depopulation drugs, my friend. Your body, your choice.

Expand full comment
Barbara's avatar

Okay 👍

Expand full comment
Lisa’s Alternate Reality's avatar

Sarah, I am reporting you for misinformation! Oh, I did already. Main stream media researcher!!!!!

Expand full comment
Lisa’s Alternate Reality's avatar

Thank you, Barbara!

Expand full comment
Sarah E. Lawton's avatar

Hi. Yes, ma'am. I know, and the article discusses how blue light affects the same chloride and calcium channels. Thanks for sharing.

Expand full comment
Amber's avatar

And I literally just started this week for the very first time to get to parasites out

Expand full comment
Ag's avatar

Bill Gates has his hand in ivermectin. Enough said.

Expand full comment
Katherine's avatar

This is a fantastic, deep dive article! Much to consider. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Lisa’s Alternate Reality's avatar

What deep dive she took articles off CDC wtactualf is going on with people?

Expand full comment
Steveo's avatar

So basically it doesn't matter what you take or don't take, we're all screwed anyway. This may do this, or may do that, or can do this of this or that has happened. A lot of conjecture. I personally can't wait to get out of here. Maybe I'll go take a couple of boxes of ivermectin.

Expand full comment
TruthAndLight's avatar

It matters. Our bodies are the temple of the Holy Spirit. It matters. 🙏🏻

Expand full comment
TruthAndLight's avatar

Goal is to help souls get right with God while we still can and inform. Ezekiel 3 and Ezekiel 37-38. Those who fail to warn — yet know— will have blood on their hands

Expand full comment
Steveo's avatar

I hear ya on that one. I pray more awaken to the truth of evil existing.

Expand full comment
Cricket's avatar

🎯

Expand full comment
jmacgregor's avatar

In case people have forgotten, it is possible to disagree with the author of an article without insulting her.

Expand full comment
Crystal Allegra's avatar

Get the book, curing the incurable by Dr levy… based on the work of Dr klenner. You can use vitamin c to cure sepsis, snake bites, general poisoning and all supposedly ‘virus’ based diseases. You can use it in the form of ascorbic acid and the liposomal form is supposed to be particularly good. There may still be some good presentations on yt by Dr levy, Dr humphries and others. So if you stocked up on ivermectin… and now want a different option…. Study vitamin c. Hopefully it is obvious that consuming vit c containing foods is a good idea as well… however, it is difficult to get high amounts while one is suffering deleterious effects of sepsis or a flu or whatever. Don’t be afraid of ascorbic acid in high amounts. Oh and heart disease too… see Linus Pauling. Rest assured, your doctor, aka pharma salesperson, is programmed to deny this and knows absolutely nothing of the clinical evidence. You need to educate yourself and take control of your own health.

Expand full comment
Denis's avatar

Great work here, Sarah. I rate 5 stars and two happy faces. Thanks.

Expand full comment